JB/159/177/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/177/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/177/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/177/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>5</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><head>Deformation, Disablement and Mutilation examined.</head></p>
 
<p>such finger belonged would be to another man:  for<lb/>
 
the loss of a single joint might take away the<lb/>
 
livelyhood of the first, <del>with</del> and not affect that<lb/>
of the second.</p>
<p>This exemplarity of a mode of punishment depends<lb/>
upon two circumstances:  the <add>relative</add> force of the impression<lb/>
which it is <del>added</del> <add>calculated</add> to make on the mind<lb/>
of a spectator:  and the frequency with which it<lb/>
is likely to meet his view.</p>
<p>As to the <add>relative</add> force of the impression this seems to<lb/>
be as great in the kinds of punishment here in<lb/>
question as in any other that can be assigned<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> except simple afflictive punishment</note>: for<lb/>
<add>I know of</add> no particular reason <add>that</add> can be given respecting this,<lb/>
more than any other why any part of the <add>penal</add> consequences<lb/>
which may result from the operation<lb/>
should be less expected by <add>adverted to</add> a bystander than by the<lb/>
suffering himself.  With simple afflictive punishment<lb/>
however this as well as all other modes of punishment<lb/>
shew to great disadvantage.  That punishment not<lb/>
being <add>naturally</add> attended with any distant consequences (the<lb/>
infamy excepted) the whole quantity of pain it is<lb/>
calculated to produce is collected as it were into<lb/>
a point and exposed at once <add>in full view</add> to the eyes of a<lb/>
spectator.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:50, 6 September 2021

Click Here To Edit

5

Deformation, Disablement and Mutilation examined.

such finger belonged would be to another man: for
the loss of a single joint might take away the
livelyhood of the first, with and not affect that
of the second.

This exemplarity of a mode of punishment depends
upon two circumstances: the relative force of the impression
which it is added calculated to make on the mind
of a spectator: and the frequency with which it
is likely to meet his view.

As to the relative force of the impression this seems to
be as great in the kinds of punishment here in
question as in any other that can be assigned except simple afflictive punishment: for
I know of no particular reason that can be given respecting this,
more than any other why any part of the penal consequences
which may result from the operation
should be less expected by adverted to a bystander than by the
suffering himself. With simple afflictive punishment
however this as well as all other modes of punishment
shew to great disadvantage. That punishment not
being naturally attended with any distant consequences (the
infamy excepted) the whole quantity of pain it is
calculated to produce is collected as it were into
a point and exposed at once in full view to the eyes of a
spectator.


Identifier: | JB/159/177/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

177

Info in main headings field

deformation, disablement and mutilation examined

Image

001

Titles

variability / exemplarity / subserviency to reformation

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

54000

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in