★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> 10<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><sic>Ch.</sic> VIII <gap/> <gap/></note><lb/>(2 <note>§. Suit <gap/> at <unclear>least 31</unclear>.</note> </p> <p><note>4<lb/><del>Article <unclear>11</unclear> Cases in which<lb/>at the first and <gap/> hearing<lb/>a suit may be terminated<lb/>in favour of defendant <add>pursuer</add><lb/>but after having <gap/></del></note></p> <p><note>1. Case 1 Defendant or<lb/>defendants <add>all</add> attending<lb/><add>Defendant</add> witnesses none</del></note></p> <p><del><sic>Art. 4. Where along with <gap/> the applicant received<lb/>As Pursuer a proposed Defendant <add><unclear>while</unclear></add> by <gap/> or by<lb/>compulsion attends at the same time <add>or the same initial hearing</add> the distinction requiring<lb/><gap/> on which this <gap/> may be thus secure things<lb/> <gap/> to the <gap/> <gap/></del></p> <!-- line in pencil across the page --> <p><del>1. <add>in</add> Cases 1. 2. 3. as above <gap/>, as above</del></p> <p><note>1<del>5</del>2<lb/><sic>Art.</sic. 1. Fewer of the terminated decrees in this case<lb/>1 <del>Mea</del> <foreign<unclear>>Opinatur dura</unclear></foreign><lb/>The pursuers demand<lb/>is well grounded 1 in the<lb/>question of law. 2. So<lb/>in the question of fact.</note></p> <p>4. Case 4. Pursuers, one or more: Defendants, one or more.<lb/><add>extensive witnesses <gap/> <gap/></add> Parties fully <gap/> on both sides, services judicial service demanded<lb/>In the general, granted. <gap/> chosen "<hi rend="underline">Pursuers demand</hi><lb/>case <add>was adequately grounded on the question of law: <add>adequately grounded</add> So in the question<lb/>of fact. Mandative <gap/>, by the issuing of which the judicial service<lb/>is rendered, and the effective service commanded to be rendered to the<lb/>Defendant, <del><gap/> <sic>expressable</sic> in the following examples</p> | <head>1825. <sic>Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> 10<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><sic>Ch.</sic> VIII <gap/> <gap/></note><lb/>(2 <note>§. Suit <gap/> at <unclear>least 31</unclear>.</note> </p> <p><note>4<lb/><del>Article <unclear>11</unclear> Cases in which<lb/>at the first and <gap/> hearing<lb/>a suit may be terminated<lb/>in favour of defendant <add>pursuer</add><lb/>but after having <gap/></del></note></p> <p><note>1. Case 1 Defendant or<lb/>defendants <add>all</add> attending<lb/><add>Defendant</add> witnesses none</del></note></p> <p><del><sic>Art. 4. Where along with <gap/> the applicant received<lb/>As Pursuer a proposed Defendant <add><unclear>while</unclear></add> by <gap/> or by<lb/>compulsion attends at the same time <add>or the same initial hearing</add> the distinction requiring<lb/><gap/> on which this <gap/> may be thus secure things<lb/> <gap/> to the <gap/> <gap/></del></p> <!-- line in pencil across the page --> <p><del>1. <add>in</add> Cases 1. 2. 3. as above <gap/>, as above</del></p> <p><note>1<del>5</del>2<lb/><sic>Art.</sic. 1. Fewer of the terminated decrees in this case<lb/>1 <del>Mea</del> <foreign<unclear>>Opinatur dura</unclear></foreign><lb/>The pursuers demand<lb/>is well grounded 1 in the<lb/>question of law. 2. So<lb/>in the question of fact.</note></p> <p>4. Case 4. Pursuers, one or more: Defendants, one or more.<lb/><add>extensive witnesses <gap/> <gap/></add> Parties fully <gap/> on both sides, services judicial service demanded<lb/>In the general, granted. <gap/> chosen "<hi rend="underline">Pursuers demand</hi><lb/>case <add>was adequately grounded on the question of law: <add>adequately grounded</add> So in the question<lb/>of fact. Mandative <gap/>, by the issuing of which the judicial service<lb/>is rendered, and the effective service commanded to be rendered to the<lb/>Defendant, <del><gap/> <sic>expressable</sic> in the following examples</p> <p><note><del>6</del>13<lb/><sic>Art.</sic. 6. II Mandative <lb/>decree. Of this, <add>the</add> time<lb/>will vary according to<lb/>the species of the case,<lb/>and thence of the suit.</note></p> <!-- Arts in pencil --> <p>Arts. Examples<lb/>1. Cause of suit, say — <hi rend="underline">Corporal vexation</hi> <del>o</del> the act — or the correspondent<lb/>attempt, preparation, menace, or challenge. Mandative<lb/>decree, comparative ordering Pay [so much]in compensation</p> <p><note>1<del>7</del>4<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 7. Case 1. No<lb/>wrong<!-- brackets in pencil --> [or <foreign>quasi</foreign> wrong]<lb/>imputed to <del>the</del> <add>any</add> Defendant<lb/>Suit purely acquisitive<lb/>partition <sic>requisitive</sic><lb/>not in <sic>inculpative</sic></note></p> <p><note>Appropriate mandate<lb/>Partition shall be begun<lb/>and under my direction<lb/>mode.</note></p> <p>2 Cause of suit, <!-- underline in pencil --> <hi rend="underline">non performance of contract</hi> — contract<lb/>the most ordinary sort. Work done. Goods furnished <del>d</del> the<lb/>expectation of <del>money</del>value in money expected in <add>just in</add> adequate<lb/>grounds. Desire here again Pay [so much] in compensation.</p> <p>3. <!-- underline in pencil -->Suit public-private cause of suit theft: goods<lb/>found on defendant — defendant <add>immediately</add> <sic>prehended<?sic> and adduced <add>by parties</add> — confessing<lb/>or in vain denying, other witnesses none. <add>Operative</add> Decree<lb/>as to <add>under</add> question of fact. The goods taken by the defendant in <add>under</add> the question<lb/>of those taken under circumstances which denominates it<lb/>theft. Mandative decree 1. <add><gap/></add> compensation paid. Convict. reason<lb/>the goods under pursuers part Convict <sic>submitt</sic> a <add>the appropriate</add> punishment<lb/[<gap/> it] thereupon <add>correspondent</add> Subsidiary mandate to<lb/>the appropriate authorities.</p> <p><note>By execution given to<lb/>this punishment correspondent<lb/>service is rendered to the<lb/>public at large — say<lb/><hi rend="underline">Accurative</hi> service.</p> | ||
1825. Feby. 10
Procedure Code
Ch. VIII </note>
(2 §. Suit at least 31.
4
Article 11 Cases in which
at the first and hearing
a suit may be terminated
in favour of defendant pursuer
but after having
1. Case 1 Defendant or
defendants all attending
Defendant witnesses none
<sic>Art. 4. Where along with the applicant received
As Pursuer a proposed Defendant while by or by
compulsion attends at the same time or the same initial hearing the distinction requiring
on which this may be thus secure things
to the
1. in Cases 1. 2. 3. as above , as above
152
<sic>Art.</sic. 1. Fewer of the terminated decrees in this case
1 Mea <foreign>Opinatur dura</foreign>
The pursuers demand
is well grounded 1 in the
question of law. 2. So
in the question of fact.
4. Case 4. Pursuers, one or more: Defendants, one or more.
extensive witnesses Parties fully on both sides, services judicial service demanded
In the general, granted. chosen "Pursuers demand
case was adequately grounded on the question of law: <add>adequately grounded So in the question
of fact. Mandative , by the issuing of which the judicial service
is rendered, and the effective service commanded to be rendered to the
Defendant, expressable in the following examples
<note>613
Art.</sic. 6. II Mandative
decree. Of this, the time
will vary according to
the species of the case,
and thence of the suit.</note>
Arts. Examples
1. Cause of suit, say — Corporal vexation o the act — or the correspondent
attempt, preparation, menace, or challenge. Mandative
decree, comparative ordering Pay [so much]in compensation
<note>174
<sic>Art. 7. Case 1. No
wrong [or quasi wrong]
imputed to the any Defendant
Suit purely acquisitive
partition requisitive
not in inculpative</note>
Appropriate mandate
Partition shall be begun
and under my direction
mode.
2 Cause of suit, non performance of contract — contract
the most ordinary sort. Work done. Goods furnished d the
expectation of moneyvalue in money expected in just in adequate
grounds. Desire here again Pay [so much] in compensation.
3. Suit public-private cause of suit theft: goods
found on defendant — defendant immediately prehended<?sic> and adduced by parties — confessing
or in vain denying, other witnesses none. Operative Decree
as to under question of fact. The goods taken by the defendant in under the question
of those taken under circumstances which denominates it
theft. Mandative decree 1. compensation paid. Convict. reason
the goods under pursuers part Convict <sic>submitt a the appropriate punishment<lb/[ it] thereupon correspondent Subsidiary mandate to
the appropriate authorities.
<note>By execution given to
this punishment correspondent
service is rendered to the
public at large — say
Accurative service.
Identifier: | JB/052/340/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-02-10 |
12-14 |
||
052 |
procedure code |
||
340 |
procedure code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
17013 |
|||