JB/050/002/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/002/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/050/002/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
<p><note>The man being<lb/>convicted &amp; the prosecution<lb/>  having  run<lb/>
<p><note>The man being<lb/>convicted &amp; the prosecution<lb/>  having  run<lb/>
on to the last stage,<lb/>
on to the last stage,<lb/>
<del>it <gap/> out/del> <add>no fewer than 4 cases</add> on<lb/>
<del>it comes out</del> <add>no fewer than 4 cases</add> on<lb/>
<del>motive in point of<lb/>
<del>motive in point of<lb/>
Judgement that<lb/>
Judgement that<lb/>
Line 15: Line 15:
come out on Motive<lb/>
come out on Motive<lb/>
in Arrest of Judgement<lb/>
in Arrest of Judgement<lb/>
Wherein it<lb/>
wherein it<lb/>
had been decided<lb/>
had been decided<lb/>
that for that species<lb/>
that for that species<lb/>
Line 24: Line 24:


<p>In the case entitled the King against Wheatly<lb/>
<p>In the case entitled the King against Wheatly<lb/>
<unclear>HR</unclear> <del>1. G.3</del> <add>1760</add> the <sic>Def:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> <add>being in <gap/></add>> <del><gap/></del> Indicted for selling <add>a <unclear>Chart</unclear> in</add>in<lb/>
<unclear>HR</unclear> <del>1. G.3</del> <add>1760</add> the <sic>Def:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic> <add>being in <gap/></add> <del><gap/></del> Indicted for selling <add>a <unclear>Chart</unclear> in</add><lb/>
<del>16 Gallons of Beer for 18.</del> <add>a less quantity of the Commodity<add> and which he<lb/>
<del>16 Gallons of Beer for 18.</del> <add>a less quantity of the Commodity</add> and which he<lb/>
dealt as if for a greater: After the Man<lb/>
dealt as &amp; for a greater: After the Man<lb/>
had been convicted of the prosecution was now<lb/>
had been convicted &amp; the prosecution was now<lb/>
on to the last stage, it comes not on <del><gap/></del> <add>Motion</add><lb/>on Arrest of Judgement, that there could be no<lb/>pretence for supporting an Indictment for<lb/>
on to the last stage, it comes not on <del>Ar</del> <add>Motion</add><lb/>on Arrest of Judgement, that there could be no<lb/>pretence for supporting an Indictment for<lb/>
such an offence, for that <del>the offence</del> <add>it had been</add> adjudged not<lb/>indictable by 3 cases <del>precisely</del> in point and<lb/>
such an Offence, for that <del>the offence</del> <add>it had been</add> adjudged not<lb/>indictable by 3 cases <del>precisely</del> in point and<lb/>
6 years before, another 9, &amp; the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> at a<lb/>time which the Reporter has not mentioned: <lb/>
6 years before, another 9, &amp; the 3<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> at a<lb/>time which the Reporter has not mentioned: &#x2014;<lb/>
<del>One of them</del> <add>The 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></add> was so exactly <add>precisely/literally</add> in print that the<lb/>Commodity, &amp; if I understand the Report aright,<lb/>even the very quantities due &amp; deficient were<lb/>
<del>One of them</del> <add>The 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></add> was so exactly <add>precisely/literally</add> in point that the<lb/>Commodity, &amp; if I understand the Report aright,<lb/>even the very quantities due &amp; deficient were<lb/>
the same.</p>
the same.</p>


<p>Nothing can be more certain, than that if <del>any</del> <add>all</add> <lb/><add>or one venture to say, any</add> of these cases had been deposited in a publication</p>
<p>Nothing can be more certain, than that if <del>any</del> <add>all</add> <lb/><add>or one venture to say, any</add> of these cases had been deposited in a publication</p>
<pb>
<pb/>
<!-- start of second column -->
<!-- start of second column -->
<p>wherein those whom it concerned might know<lb/>
<p>wherein those whom it concerned might know<lb/>
where to meet with them, the vexation of this<lb/>Suit would not have <sic>happen'd</sic>: <del>the same is to be</del> <add>&amp; this is equally <del><gap/></del><lb/><del>observed also</del> of every one of these cases <add>also</add> after the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi>.<lb/><del>Thus it is that the property's.  The</del></p> <p>Thus it is that the property, the liberty,<lb/>the personal Security. &amp; never the life of the subject<lb/><add>on so many occasion to this hour</add> is <sic>suffer'd</sic> to be the sport of <unclear>Fortune</unclear>, for<lb/>I know not what else it is, if not Fortune, that<lb/>is to determine whether there be an Advocate who<lb/>is in possession of such a case, or who has a<lb/>friend or a <add>paid</add> friend who is, and whether the Advocate<lb/>in question or the friend or the friend's<lb?>friend suspects that he has it,  &amp; whether <del>any</del> <add>that</add><lb/><add>one</add> of them who suspects he has it, succeeds in finding<lb/>it. <del><gap/></del> &amp; whether <add>in short</add> such Advocate <add><gap/> <gap/> at</add> amongst the<lb/>variety of others, <add>competitors</add> happens to be <sic>employ'd</sic>.</p> <p>Thus had 4 sets of <sic>Plffs</sic> <add>Prosecutors</add> one after another that<lb/>are known of been harassing themselves &amp; so<lb/>many Defendants [in order] to gain a point, <add>any of this one</add> when<lb/><note>after</note>the Law without their knowledge had <sic>whisper'd</sic> to <add>it</add>be unattainable.</p> <p><note>no more than it would<lb/>if any of these Suits<lb/>if the want of the proceeding<lb/><had been promulgated<lb/>in like manner.<lb/>It is thus the subject<lb/>is <gap/> <add>plundered</add> &amp;<lb/><sic>harrassed</sic>, <add>kept in torture</add> while<lb/>prevented <gap/> are locked<lb/>up in the closet,<lb/>which are never<lb/>to be brought forth<lb/><sic>till</sic> the discourse<lb/>has run on to the<lb/>last stage.</note></p> <p><note>nothing pertinent<lb/>in this case<lb/><gap/> as being <unclear>ye</unclear><lb/>first <del><gap/></del> name<lb/>to hand.</note></p>
where to meet with them, the vexation of this<lb/>Suit would not have <sic>happen'd</sic>: <del>the same is to be</del> <add>&amp; this is equally <del>true</del></add><lb/><del>observed also</del> of every one of these cases <add>also</add> after the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi>.<lb/><del>Thus it is that the property's.  The</del></p> <p>Thus it is that the property, the liberty,<lb/>the personal Security. &amp; even the life of the subject<lb/>is <sic>suffer'd</sic> <add>on so many occasion to this hour</add> to be the sport of Fortune, for<lb/>I know not what else it is, if not Fortune, that<lb/>is to determine whether there be an Advocate who<lb/>is in possession of such a case, or who has a<lb/>friend or a <add>friend's</add> friend who is, and whether the Advocate<lb/>in question or the friend or the friend's<lb/>friend suspects that he has it,  &amp; whether <del>any</del> <add>that</add><lb/><add>one</add> of them who suspects he has it, succeeds in finding<lb/>it. <del><gap/></del> &amp; whether <add>in short</add> such Advocate amongst <add>from amidst</add> the<lb/>variety of others, <add>competitors</add> happens to be <sic>employ'd</sic>.</p> <p>Thus had 4 sets of <sic>Plffs</sic> <add>Prosecutors</add> one after another that<lb/>are known of been <sic>harrassing</sic> themselves &amp; so<lb/>many Defendants [in order] to gain a point, <add>any of this one</add> when<lb/><note>after</note> the Law without their knowledge had <sic>whisper'd</sic> to <add>it</add><lb/>be unattainable.</p> <p><note>no more than it would<lb/>if any of these Suits<lb/>if the want of the proceeding<lb/>had been promulgated<lb/>in like manner.<lb/>It is thus the subject<lb/>is <unclear>pillaged</unclear> <add>plundered</add> &amp;<lb/><sic>harrassed</sic>, <add>kept in torture</add> while<lb/>prevented <unclear>as</unclear> are locked<lb/>up in the closet,<lb/>which are never<lb/>to be brought forth<lb/><sic>till</sic> the discourse<lb/>has run on to its<lb/>last stage.</note></p> <p><note>nothing particular<lb/>in this case<lb/><gap/> as being <unclear>ye</unclear><lb/>first <del>that</del> name<lb/>to hand.</note></p>




Line 49: Line 49:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:02, 1 October 2021

Click Here To Edit NOTORIETY

Barrow 1125

The man being
convicted & the prosecution
having run
on to the last stage,
it comes out no fewer than 4 cases on
motive in point of
Judgement that
there had been

precisely in point
come out on Motive
in Arrest of Judgement
wherein it
had been decided
that for that species
of delinquency no
Indictment was to
be maintained.


In the case entitled the King against Wheatly
HR 1. G.3 1760 the Def:t being in Indicted for selling a Chart in
16 Gallons of Beer for 18. a less quantity of the Commodity and which he
dealt as & for a greater: After the Man
had been convicted & the prosecution was now
on to the last stage, it comes not on Ar Motion
on Arrest of Judgement, that there could be no
pretence for supporting an Indictment for
such an Offence, for that the offence it had been adjudged not
indictable by 3 cases precisely in point and
6 years before, another 9, & the 3d at a
time which the Reporter has not mentioned: —
One of them The 2d was so exactly precisely/literally in point that the
Commodity, & if I understand the Report aright,
even the very quantities due & deficient were
the same.

Nothing can be more certain, than that if any all
or one venture to say, any of these cases had been deposited in a publication


---page break---

wherein those whom it concerned might know
where to meet with them, the vexation of this
Suit would not have happen'd: the same is to be & this is equally true
observed also of every one of these cases also after the 1st.
Thus it is that the property's. The

Thus it is that the property, the liberty,
the personal Security. & even the life of the subject
is suffer'd on so many occasion to this hour to be the sport of Fortune, for
I know not what else it is, if not Fortune, that
is to determine whether there be an Advocate who
is in possession of such a case, or who has a
friend or a friend's friend who is, and whether the Advocate
in question or the friend or the friend's
friend suspects that he has it, & whether any that
one of them who suspects he has it, succeeds in finding
it. & whether in short such Advocate amongst from amidst the
variety of others, competitors happens to be employ'd.

Thus had 4 sets of Plffs Prosecutors one after another that
are known of been harrassing themselves & so
many Defendants [in order] to gain a point, any of this one when
after the Law without their knowledge had whisper'd to it
be unattainable.

no more than it would
if any of these Suits
if the want of the proceeding
had been promulgated
in like manner.
It is thus the subject
is pillaged plundered &
harrassed, kept in torture while
prevented as are locked
up in the closet,
which are never
to be brought forth
till the discourse
has run on to its
last stage.

nothing particular
in this case
as being ye
first that name
to hand.







Identifier: | JB/050/002/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

002

Info in main headings field

introduction. crimes. offences sins &c

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15993

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in