JB/015/192/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/015/192/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/192/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/192/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->54</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>3.  The moral or popular sanction – is that which is commonly called<lb/>
 
public opinion – it is the <add>received</add> decision of society on conduct.  The popular<lb/>
 
sanction <del>is</del> <add>may be</add> divided into two branches <add>the democratic &amp; aristocratic</add> awarding a very different portion<lb/>
 
of recompense or punishment to acts of a similar character.  A sanction<lb/>
by every instance of its execution constitutes &amp; executes a law, – &amp; the<lb/>
laws constituted by the Aristocratic branch are over a great portion<lb/>
of the field of conduct in repugnance to those constituted by the<lb/>
<del>Aristo</del><add>Demo</add>cratic.  In misdeeds affecting <hi rend="underline">persons</hi>, for example, – the democratic<lb/>
sanction tolerates boxing, – the trying to hurt, not duelling, trying to kill, –<lb/>
while the aristocratic tolerates &amp; rewards <del>actions</del> trying to kill.  Of<lb/>
misdeeds affecting <hi rend="underline">property</hi>, <add>the</add> democratic sanction gives preference to<lb/>
the debts <del>of</del> <add>due to</add> a tradesman over those due to a gamester.  The aristocratic<lb/>
sanction decides directly the reverse.  The Democratic sanction <del>would</del> punishes<lb/>
swindling in all its shapes.  The Aristocratic rewards it in the case &amp;<lb/>
situation of a man of landed &amp; entailed estate.  In the democratic<lb/>
scale of reprobation the mischievous stands above the ridiculous – <lb/>
in the aristocratic the ridiculous above the mischievous.  The<lb/>
Democratic refers, – or is at least constantly tending more &amp; more to<lb/>
refer every thing to the standard of utility – to the greatest happiness<lb/>
principle – the aristocratical as much, as far &amp; as long as possible<lb/>
to the standard of taste – <del>as</del> constituting itself the arbiter of taste.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:05, 1 October 2021

Click Here To Edit

54

3. The moral or popular sanction – is that which is commonly called
public opinion – it is the received decision of society on conduct. The popular
sanction is may be divided into two branches the democratic & aristocratic awarding a very different portion
of recompense or punishment to acts of a similar character. A sanction
by every instance of its execution constitutes & executes a law, – & the
laws constituted by the Aristocratic branch are over a great portion
of the field of conduct in repugnance to those constituted by the
AristoDemocratic. In misdeeds affecting persons, for example, – the democratic
sanction tolerates boxing, – the trying to hurt, not duelling, trying to kill, –
while the aristocratic tolerates & rewards actions trying to kill. Of
misdeeds affecting property, the democratic sanction gives preference to
the debts of due to a tradesman over those due to a gamester. The aristocratic
sanction decides directly the reverse. The Democratic sanction would punishes
swindling in all its shapes. The Aristocratic rewards it in the case &
situation of a man of landed & entailed estate. In the democratic
scale of reprobation the mischievous stands above the ridiculous –
in the aristocratic the ridiculous above the mischievous. The
Democratic refers, – or is at least constantly tending more & more to
refer every thing to the standard of utility – to the greatest happiness
principle – the aristocratical as much, as far & as long as possible
to the standard of taste – as constituting itself the arbiter of taste.


Identifier: | JB/015/192/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

192

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f54

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

j & m mills 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

john fraunceis gwyn

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

5408

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in