JB/109/072/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/109/072/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/109/072/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/109/072/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>1819 May 19</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>On the frequency of Elections we have left ourselves no room<lb/>
 
to dwell at present.  They may be too frequent for exciting universal<lb/>
 
attention and national sympathy.  Whatever is very frequent becomes<lb/>
 
familiar.  It is viewed with little interest, and done with no<lb/>
spirit.  We subjoin the following argument against annual<lb/>
Election from an unpublished work of M<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Bentham which we have<lb/>
the good fortune to possess, – not for the puerile purpose of charging<lb/>
him with inconsistency, but because it contains <hi rend="underline">unanswerable<lb/>
reasoning</hi> conveyed in clear an precise language.</p>
<p>"Next to the having no periodical Elections, is the having<lb/>
them as frequent as possible:  Why?  Because, the oftener they come<lb/>
round, the less the danger is of a change.  As the mischiefs of changing<lb/>
so often as you might change are so palpable, and as you<lb/>
see no more reason for changing one time than another, you even<lb/>
take things as they are, and enter into a sort of implicit engagement<lb/>
with yourself not to change at all.</p>
<p>'This is no speculative conjecture:  it is but a key to facts<lb/>
offered by experience.  In England, wherever regular succession is<lb/>
not the object,* <note>* Examples:  Lord Mayor of London;  Sheriffs of London.</note> annual elections prove in effect appointments<lb/>
for life, subject only to a periodical power of <del>a Motion</del> <add>inaction</add> which is<lb/>
rarely exercised:<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> Examples:  Chamberlain of London:  Chairman of the Justices of the Peace for Middlesex:  President of the Royal Society – (to which may be added the Common Council of London.)</note> while longer terms product frequent changes,<lb/>
and still more frequent struggles.<hi rend="superscript">‡</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">‡</hi> Examples:  Member of Parliament.</note>  (Remarks on the Judicial<lb/>
Establishment in France, chap 5 title 3.)'</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:09, 15 October 2021

Click Here To Edit

1819 May 19

On the frequency of Elections we have left ourselves no room
to dwell at present. They may be too frequent for exciting universal
attention and national sympathy. Whatever is very frequent becomes
familiar. It is viewed with little interest, and done with no
spirit. We subjoin the following argument against annual
Election from an unpublished work of Mr. Bentham which we have
the good fortune to possess, – not for the puerile purpose of charging
him with inconsistency, but because it contains unanswerable
reasoning
conveyed in clear an precise language.

"Next to the having no periodical Elections, is the having
them as frequent as possible: Why? Because, the oftener they come
round, the less the danger is of a change. As the mischiefs of changing
so often as you might change are so palpable, and as you
see no more reason for changing one time than another, you even
take things as they are, and enter into a sort of implicit engagement
with yourself not to change at all.

'This is no speculative conjecture: it is but a key to facts
offered by experience. In England, wherever regular succession is
not the object,* * Examples: Lord Mayor of London; Sheriffs of London. annual elections prove in effect appointments
for life, subject only to a periodical power of a Motion inaction which is
rarely exercised: Examples: Chamberlain of London: Chairman of the Justices of the Peace for Middlesex: President of the Royal Society – (to which may be added the Common Council of London.) while longer terms product frequent changes,
and still more frequent struggles. Examples: Member of Parliament. (Remarks on the Judicial
Establishment in France, chap 5 title 3.)'


Identifier: | JB/109/072/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109.

Date_1

1819-05-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

28 or 1

Box

109

Main Headings

Parliamentary Reform

Folio number

072

Info in main headings field

Parl. Reform or Disfranchising

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E7

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::I&M [Prince of Wales feathers] 1818]]

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

35727

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in