JB/141/047/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/047/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 19: Line 19:
p.XXIV</p>
p.XXIV</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:22, 3 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

B.2. Ch.1. p.6

Note 1.

* The Chinese, owing perhaps to the extensive
use they make of this mode of punishment,
have attempted by fixing the length, & breadth
at the extremities & weight of the bamboo
to render uniform the amount of the suffering
produced by this mode of punishment: but
one material circumstance that they have omitted
to regulate, and certainly the most difficult
to regulate, is the degree of force with which
the stroke is to be applied – an omission
that leaves the uncertainty nearly in the
same state as in this country. See the Penal
Code of China translated by Sir G.T. Staunton
p.XXIV


Identifier: | JB/141/047/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

047

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note 1

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

richard smith

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48264

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in