JB/149/235/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/149/235/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/149/235/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/235/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/235/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>Language</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>grammatical conjugates<lb/>
 
verbs and<lb/>
 
substantives:  they<lb/>
 
are aggregates<lb/>
<del>wh</del> as logical conjugates<lb/>
are aggregates<lb/>
of aggregates<lb/>
able:  any<lb/>
modification applied<lb/>
to any one root<lb/>
I am for applying<lb/>
to all roots</p>
<p>great advantage<lb/>
of English language<lb/>
that substantive<lb/>
may be made<lb/>
to perform the<lb/>
office of adjectives<lb/>
as <hi rend="underline">hand</hi>kerchief<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">hand</hi>barrow.<lb/>
This cannot be<lb/>
done in French.</p>
<p>I have gone a<lb/>
great way in giving<lb/>
the genealogy of all<lb/>
the fictitious entities
belonging to property<lb/>
but it is as<lb/>
Herculean labour.</p>
<p><del>Food</del><lb/>
To some no objects but<lb/>
individual objects present<lb/>
themselves.  The names<lb/>
first in use accordingly<lb/>
must have been<lb/>
<add><del>common names</del></add> proper names.</p>
<p><del>The</del> From the insertion<lb/>
of <del>common</del> <add>proper</add> names<lb/>
to the mention of<lb/>
common names the<lb/>
step is as wide.</p>
<p><del>the discourse</del><lb/>
In all discourse there are<lb/>
certain imperfections:<lb/>
1.  Superfluity by irrelevancy.<lb/>
2.  Superfluity by repetition<lb/>
in <unclear>terminus</unclear>.<lb/>
3.  Superfluity by verbal<lb/>
repetition<lb/>
4  Verbosity<lb/>
5  Scantiness<lb/>
<del>6.  <gap/></del></p>
<pb/>
<p>6  Inconsistency<lb/>
including self<lb/>
contradictatory<lb/>
propositions.<lb/>
7  Ambiguity<lb/>
8  Obscurity<lb/>
9  Confusedness<lb/>
10  Desultoriness</p>
<p>Many are the<lb/>
instances in which<lb/>
<del>no</del> observations<lb/>
are worthless for<lb/>
instruction<lb/>
but excellent<lb/>
as mementos.</p>
<p>The distinction<lb/>
between repetition<lb/>
in impart and<lb/>
repetitive in <unclear>heresy</unclear><lb/>
may be <del>found</del><lb/>
found useful.</p>
<p>Applied to individuals<lb/>
alone, nomenclature<lb/>
is but nomenclature<lb/>
– to aggregates<lb/>
nomenclature is<lb/>
classification.</p>
<p>Classification involving<lb/>
assertion:  assertion<lb/>
of the agreement<lb/>
as having place<lb/>
among all the<lb/>
individuals to which<lb/>
the denomination<lb/>
applies.</p>
<p>I always state an<lb/>
exception in the<lb/>
first instance<lb/>
that the reader<lb/>
may not receive<lb/>
an impression<lb/>
in the first instance<lb/>
which they have<lb/>
afterwards to<lb/>
correct.</p>
<p>Exceptions excepted<lb/>
forbear – to put<lb/>
sentences more<lb/>
than one into the<lb/>
same article<lb/>
– propositions<lb/>
more than one into<lb/>
the same sentence.</p>
<pb/>
<p>Propositions more<lb/>
than one are<lb/>
capable of having<lb/>
place in the same<lb/>
sentence when<lb/>
1  To one verb<lb/>
there are substances<lb/>
more than one<lb/>
with expressions of<lb/>
agency<lb/>
2.  To one verb<lb/>
substances more<lb/>
than one with<lb/>
expressions of<lb/>
passiveness.</p>
<p>Beautiful exemplifications<lb/>
of the manner in which<lb/>
sentences <del>and</del> or<lb/>
propositions are<lb/>
broken down to<lb/>
elementary or say<lb/>
atomic propositions<lb/>
<unclear>Compas</unclear> Digest.</p>
<p>Properties desirable<lb/>
1.  in discourse in<lb/>
general<lb/>
1  Clearness ie absence of<lb/>
1  obsurity<lb/>
<del>or</del> 2 Ambiguity<lb/>
3  Undefinedness or indistinctness<lb/>
&amp; repeatedness.
2.  Correctness<lb/>
3  <add>Copiousness</add> Completeness with<lb/>
referrence to the<lb/>
purpose on each<lb/>
occasion<lb/>
4  Consistency:  ie<lb/>
absence of inconsistency<lb/>
with referrence<lb/>
1  The elementary<lb/>
parts of the proposition<lb/>
itself<lb/>
2.  Other propositions<lb/>
in the same discourse.<lb/>
3.  Other propositions<lb/>
in other discourses of<lb/>
the same person.<lb/>
5.  Conciseness in the<lb/>
case of each proposition<lb/>
taken by itself.</p>
<pb/>
<p>6  Compactness in<lb/>
the case of a number<lb/>
of propositions relative<lb/>
to the same subject.<lb/>
7  Impressiveness<lb/>
8  Melodiousness<lb/>
9.  Instructiveness<lb/>
by means of
accessory ideas.<lb/>
10  Agreableness by<lb/>
means of accessory<lb/>
ideas.</p>
<p>An instance of the<lb/>
importance of<lb/>
compressedness in<lb/>
language is<lb/>
<del>afforded by the</del><lb/>
afforded in English<lb/>
<del>so</del> legislation by<lb/>
the riot act.</p>
<p>Dignity of Style.<lb/>
By dignity I mean<lb/>
that character of<lb/>
style which is the<lb/>
result of its being<lb/>
such as to convey<lb/>
to the <del>speaker</del> <add>hearer</add> or<lb/>
<del>writer</del> <add>reader</add> the idea of<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">self possession</hi> on<lb/>
the part of<lb/>
the speaker or<lb/>
writer:  the idea<lb/>
of his having acquired<lb/>
a mastery over the<lb/>
subject <del>w</del> he<lb/>
has taken in hand,<lb/>
or at least of his having<lb/>
<del>settled and</del> arranged<lb/>
and settled his thoughts<lb/>
concerning it.</p>
<p>The signs of strength<lb/>
of mind (in a writer<lb/>
are exhibited as his<lb/>
writings are clear<lb/>
of certain marks<lb/>
which may be<lb/>
considered assumptions<lb/>
of weakness.<lb/>
1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> Laxity;  2<lb/>
Fumbling.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:42, 10 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

Language

grammatical conjugates
verbs and
substantives: they
are aggregates
wh as logical conjugates
are aggregates
of aggregates
able: any
modification applied
to any one root
I am for applying
to all roots

great advantage
of English language
that substantive
may be made
to perform the
office of adjectives
as handkerchief
handbarrow.
This cannot be
done in French.

I have gone a
great way in giving
the genealogy of all
the fictitious entities belonging to property
but it is as
Herculean labour.

Food
To some no objects but
individual objects present
themselves. The names
first in use accordingly
must have been
common names proper names.

The From the insertion
of common proper names
to the mention of
common names the
step is as wide.

the discourse
In all discourse there are
certain imperfections:
1. Superfluity by irrelevancy.
2. Superfluity by repetition
in terminus.
3. Superfluity by verbal
repetition
4 Verbosity
5 Scantiness
6.


---page break---

6 Inconsistency
including self
contradictatory
propositions.
7 Ambiguity
8 Obscurity
9 Confusedness
10 Desultoriness

Many are the
instances in which
no observations
are worthless for
instruction
but excellent
as mementos.

The distinction
between repetition
in impart and
repetitive in heresy
may be found
found useful.

Applied to individuals
alone, nomenclature
is but nomenclature
– to aggregates
nomenclature is
classification.

Classification involving
assertion: assertion
of the agreement
as having place
among all the
individuals to which
the denomination
applies.

I always state an
exception in the
first instance
that the reader
may not receive
an impression
in the first instance
which they have
afterwards to
correct.

Exceptions excepted
forbear – to put
sentences more
than one into the
same article
– propositions
more than one into
the same sentence.


---page break---

Propositions more
than one are
capable of having
place in the same
sentence when
1 To one verb
there are substances
more than one
with expressions of
agency
2. To one verb
substances more
than one with
expressions of
passiveness.

Beautiful exemplifications
of the manner in which
sentences and or
propositions are
broken down to
elementary or say
atomic propositions
Compas Digest.

Properties desirable
1. in discourse in
general
1 Clearness ie absence of
1 obsurity
or 2 Ambiguity
3 Undefinedness or indistinctness
& repeatedness. 2. Correctness
3 Copiousness Completeness with
referrence to the
purpose on each
occasion
4 Consistency: ie
absence of inconsistency
with referrence
1 The elementary
parts of the proposition
itself
2. Other propositions
in the same discourse.
3. Other propositions
in other discourses of
the same person.
5. Conciseness in the
case of each proposition
taken by itself.


---page break---

6 Compactness in
the case of a number
of propositions relative
to the same subject.
7 Impressiveness
8 Melodiousness
9. Instructiveness
by means of accessory ideas.
10 Agreableness by
means of accessory
ideas.

An instance of the
importance of
compressedness in
language is
afforded by the
afforded in English
so legislation by
the riot act.

Dignity of Style.
By dignity I mean
that character of
style which is the
result of its being
such as to convey
to the speaker hearer or
writer reader the idea of
self possession on
the part of
the speaker or
writer: the idea
of his having acquired
a mastery over the
subject w he
has taken in hand,
or at least of his having
settled and arranged
and settled his thoughts
concerning it.

The signs of strength
of mind (in a writer
are exhibited as his
writings are clear
of certain marks
which may be
considered assumptions
of weakness.
1st Laxity; 2
Fumbling.


Identifier: | JB/149/235/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

language

Folio number

235

Info in main headings field

language

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50089

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in