★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>182<del>8</del>7 <del>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</del> Feb.2</p> | |||
<note>Ch. VII Probation & Evidence<lb/> | |||
S.18. Character Evidence</note><lb/> | |||
<head>Procedure <del>Penal</del> Code.</head> | |||
<note>8<lb/> | |||
<p>Exclusion of character<lb/> | |||
evidence<lb/> | |||
Reason 1 The effect<lb/> | |||
<del>not the</del> of evidence of<lb/> | |||
habitual mendacity<lb/> | |||
not to produce exclusion<lb/> | |||
of a witness</note><lb/> | |||
<p>Ratiocinative</p> | |||
<p>Art 8. Why in ordinary cases, put <add>in this case</add> an exclusion upon<lb/> | |||
character evidence? Answer. Reason.</p> | |||
1. For <add>the</add> reason <del><gap/></del> as per 11. the effect of any<lb/> | |||
evidence ass<gap/> <add>even of habitual</add> of mendacity will not be to produce<lb/> | |||
the exclusion of the individual in the capacity of a witness<lb/> | |||
side effect that of producing an opinion in affirma<gap/> of<lb/> | |||
a corresponding degree of comparative untrustworthiness<lb/> | |||
in the part of his <add>personal</add><del><gap/></del> evidence</p> | |||
<note>9<lb/> | |||
Reason 2. Such evidence<lb/> | |||
only amounts to weak<lb/> | |||
circumstantial evidence</note><lb/> | |||
<p><del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">Ratiocinative</hi></p> | |||
Art.9.22. It follows | |||
that can be afforded will | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
18287 Novr. Feb.2
Ch. VII Probation & Evidence
S.18. Character Evidence
Procedure Penal Code.
8
Exclusion of character
evidence
Reason 1 The effect
not the of evidence of
habitual mendacity
not to produce exclusion
of a witness
Ratiocinative
Art 8. Why in ordinary cases, put in this case an exclusion upon
character evidence? Answer. Reason.
1. For the reason as per 11. the effect of any
evidence ass even of habitual of mendacity will not be to produce
the exclusion of the individual in the capacity of a witness
side effect that of producing an opinion in affirma of
a corresponding degree of comparative untrustworthiness
in the part of his personal evidence
9
Reason 2. Such evidence
only amounts to weak
circumstantial evidence
Ratiocinative
Art.9.22. It follows that can be afforded will
|
Identifier: | JB/052/372/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-02-02 |
8-10 |
||
|
052 |
procedure code |
||
|
372 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
ratiocinative / ratiocinative / ratiocinative |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d3 / e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1827 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1827 |
|||
|
17045 |
|||
