JB/118/020/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/020/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/020/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/020/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>Does the Act thus <del>committ</del> <add>put</add> the choice of<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
the spot <del>to</del> <add>in the power of an individual, in the power of</add> your Memorialist altogether? – Does<lb/>
 
it give him a negative upon it in every case?<lb/>
 
By no means.  It gives him no negative<lb/>
 
upon the choice of that <add>best of all</add> spots which has been<lb/>
chosen by such high authority and after such<lb/>
nature deliberation.  Convenient or inconvenient<lb/>
to <hi rend="underline">him</hi>, your Lordships may well call upon him<lb/>
to take <hi rend="underline">that</hi> or none.  He has pronounced it<lb/>
convenient, he is estopped from calling it otherwise.<lb/>
Could he, pointing to any <del>other</del> <add>new</add> spot, <add>say,</add> <hi rend="underline">this would<lb/>
be more convenient to me than the old one, therefore<lb/>
<add>you are bound to</add> give it me instead</hi>?  No certain, <del>unless</del> <add>not even</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>were he able to</add> shew that it would <del>at least be <gap/></del> <add>be still more</add> <hi rend="underline">convenient<lb/>
and proper</hi> with reference to the public<lb/>
in every point of view.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> The <del>law</del> <add>Act</add> admitts that other spots may perhaps be found as convenient and proper:  but it does not admitt that any can be more so.</note>  Hard indeed then would it<lb/>
be, if while one party, your Memorialist <add>were bound,</add> the other<lb/>
party, the public, whom your Lordships represent, should<lb/>
be altogether free.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:35, 14 January 2022

Click Here To Edit

Does the Act thus committ put the choice of
the spot to in the power of an individual, in the power of your Memorialist altogether? – Does
it give him a negative upon it in every case?
By no means. It gives him no negative
upon the choice of that best of all spots which has been
chosen by such high authority and after such
nature deliberation. Convenient or inconvenient
to him, your Lordships may well call upon him
to take that or none. He has pronounced it
convenient, he is estopped from calling it otherwise.
Could he, pointing to any other new spot, say, this would
be more convenient to me than the old one, therefore
you are bound to give it me instead
? No certain, unless not even
were he able to shew that it would at least be be still more convenient
and proper
with reference to the public
in every point of view. The law Act admitts that other spots may perhaps be found as convenient and proper: but it does not admitt that any can be more so. Hard indeed then would it
be, if while one party, your Memorialist were bound, the other
party, the public, whom your Lordships represent, should
be altogether free.


Identifier: | JB/118/020/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

30

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

020

Info in main headings field

memorial

Image

003

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f41 / f42 / f43 / f44

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

draft of letter 988, vol. 5

ID Number

39074

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in