JB/081/047/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/081/047/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/081/047/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/047/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/081/047/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1828. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi><lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Petition for Justice</head><lb/>
 
<note>1.  Case<lb/>
 
IV.  Mendacity<lb/>
 
3.  practised.</note></p>
<p>29. or 17<lb/>
Mischievous<lb/>
A less dangerous power<lb/>
would be that of<lb/>
feigning the justificative<lb/>
on extenuating circumstances.</p>
<p>30. or 18.<lb/>
Mischievous Jury operating<lb/>
Recently, of this power<lb/>
the effect has frequently<lb/>
been produced.<lb/>
Not indeed by a fiction<lb/>
of the Judge, but<lb/>
by a fiction of the Jury,<lb/>
at the recommendation<lb/>
of a Judge:  10. as<lb/>
20. pronounced less<lb/>
than 2.<lb/>
Mischievous Judge Subornes<lb/>
In the Judge, this<lb/>
was not mendacity<lb/>
but subornation of it<lb/>
in the shape of perjury.</p>
<p>31. or 19.<lb/>
Mischievous in Civils<lb/>
So <hi rend="underline">in Civils</hi>, Judge<lb/>
might give to every<lb/>
body the property of<lb/>
every body.</p>
<p>32. or 20.<lb/>
Use to Judge Evil consciousness<lb/>
Use being none of<lb/>
the practice, for what<lb/>
purpose but the abuse<lb/>
do you adhere<lb/>
to it?</p>
<p>33. or 21.<lb/>
Use to Judge Evil consciousness<lb/>
Such being the purposes<lb/>
to which all your<lb/>
predecessors applied it<lb/>
for what better can<lb/>
you be thus endeavoring<lb/>
to retain it?</p>
<pb/>
<p>34. or 22.<lb/>
Use to Judge Untrustworthiness.<lb/>
In such Judges, <unclear>bill</unclear><lb/>
for prejudice and<lb/>
weakness, never could<lb/>
the people repose any<lb/>
confidence.</p>
<p>35. or 23.<lb/>
Use to Judge Untrustworthiness<lb/>
What rationally grounded<lb/>
confidence in<lb/>
men, who either think<lb/>
or pretend to think<lb/>
that wilful falshood<lb/>
is either necessary or<lb/>
subservient to justice?</p>
<p>36. or 24.<lb/>
Use to Judges  Untrustworthiness<lb/>
In men who are<lb/>
continually punishing,<lb/>
or professing themselves<lb/>
desirous to punish<lb/>
in others the<lb/>
criminality they are<lb/>
themselves practising<lb/>
without shame.</p>
<p>37. or 25.<lb/>
Inconsistence with Challenging<lb/>
See a man actually<lb/>
in it endeavouring<lb/>
to be in the daily<lb/>
practice of mendacity<lb/>
for hire, yet ready<lb/>
to challenge any man<lb/>
who imputes it to him,<lb/>
to try to <unclear>kill</unclear> one another.<lb/>
and this man, when<lb/>
Judge, ready to punish<lb/>
any man for any<lb/>
such challenge!!!</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:40, 21 January 2022

Click Here To Edit

1828. Decr.
Petition for Justice
1. Case
IV. Mendacity
3. practised.

29. or 17
Mischievous
A less dangerous power
would be that of
feigning the justificative
on extenuating circumstances.

30. or 18.
Mischievous Jury operating
Recently, of this power
the effect has frequently
been produced.
Not indeed by a fiction
of the Judge, but
by a fiction of the Jury,
at the recommendation
of a Judge: 10. as
20. pronounced less
than 2.
Mischievous Judge Subornes
In the Judge, this
was not mendacity
but subornation of it
in the shape of perjury.

31. or 19.
Mischievous in Civils
So in Civils, Judge
might give to every
body the property of
every body.

32. or 20.
Use to Judge Evil consciousness
Use being none of
the practice, for what
purpose but the abuse
do you adhere
to it?

33. or 21.
Use to Judge Evil consciousness
Such being the purposes
to which all your
predecessors applied it
for what better can
you be thus endeavoring
to retain it?


---page break---

34. or 22.
Use to Judge Untrustworthiness.
In such Judges, bill
for prejudice and
weakness, never could
the people repose any
confidence.

35. or 23.
Use to Judge Untrustworthiness
What rationally grounded
confidence in
men, who either think
or pretend to think
that wilful falshood
is either necessary or
subservient to justice?

36. or 24.
Use to Judges Untrustworthiness
In men who are
continually punishing,
or professing themselves
desirous to punish
in others the
criminality they are
themselves practising
without shame.

37. or 25.
Inconsistence with Challenging
See a man actually
in it endeavouring
to be in the daily
practice of mendacity
for hire, yet ready
to challenge any man
who imputes it to him,
to try to kill one another.
and this man, when
Judge, ready to punish
any man for any
such challenge!!!


Identifier: | JB/081/047/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1828-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

29 or 17 - 37 or 25

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

047

Info in main headings field

petition for justice

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25834

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in