★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>G.B. 1827. Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 20 copied.</p> | |||
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> | |||
<p>1.</p> | |||
<p>Logical field of Service<lb/> | |||
nearly what in<lb/> | |||
French denominated<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">competence</hi>.</p> | |||
<p>2.</p> | |||
<p>But signification of<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">logical field of service</hi><lb/> | |||
more ample, since it<lb/> | |||
comprises both person<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">who</hi> and things <hi rend="underline">which</hi> | |||
are subject matters of<lb/> | |||
operation.</p> | |||
<p>3.</p> | |||
<p>Judicatory field omnicomprehensive<lb/> | |||
and territory.</p> | |||
<p>Reasons.</p> | |||
<p>1. No one Judicatory<lb/> | |||
of which the Judge, in<lb/> | |||
giving effect to a just<lb/> | |||
demand, may not find<lb/> | |||
it necessary to give<lb/> | |||
effect to it in the territory<lb/> | |||
of any other judicatory.</p> | |||
<p>4.</p> | |||
<p>Ends of justice, contravened<lb/> | |||
by division<lb/> | |||
of the logical field<lb/> | |||
of service between<lb/> | |||
Judicatory and Judicatory.</p> | |||
<p>5.</p> | |||
<p>Sale argument in<lb/> | |||
favour of a logical<lb/> | |||
division is derived<lb/> | |||
from the <del>immorality</del><add>universality</add><lb/> | |||
of the practice.</p> | |||
<pb/> | |||
<p>6.</p> | |||
<p>Existing system a<lb/> | |||
labyrinth in which<lb/> | |||
the mind is bewildered.</p> | |||
<p>II. 1 7.</p> | |||
<p>Omnicompetence<lb/> | |||
necessary.</p> | |||
<p>II.5</p> | |||
<p>Of the opposite exclusionary<lb/> | |||
justificative<lb/> | |||
cause, none.</p> | |||
<p>8.</p> | |||
<p>Efficient cause, primæval<lb/> | |||
barbarism.</p> | |||
<p>II. 3. 9.</p> | |||
<p>Evil effects.</p> | |||
<p>1. Expense.</p> | |||
<p>set of</p> | |||
<p>By the second independent/judicatories.<lb/> | |||
expense doubled.</p> | |||
<p>II. 34 10.</p> | |||
<p>2. Uncertainty and<lb/> | |||
uncognoscibility.</p> | |||
<p>In every different<lb/> | |||
sort of Judicatory,<lb/> | |||
ways for coming at<lb/> | |||
the truth different.<lb/> | |||
yet most apt way<lb/> | |||
there can not be more<lb/> | |||
than me.</p> | |||
<p>Under every existing<lb/> | |||
system all may be,<lb/> | |||
no more than one<lb/> | |||
can be, comparatively<lb/> | |||
apt.</p> | |||
<p>Under the existing<lb/> | |||
system, aberrations<lb/> | |||
multitudinous and<lb/> | |||
various.</p> | |||
<p>II.56</p> | |||
<p>For each of them, to<lb/> | |||
him by whom the existence<lb/> | |||
of a justificative<lb/> | |||
cause is alledged,<lb/> | |||
it belongs to exhibit it.</p><pb/> | |||
<p>1826. March 12</p> | |||
<p>11.</p> | |||
<p>Judicial division<lb/> | |||
of the territory into<lb/> | |||
districts and subdistricts.</p> | |||
<p>12.</p> | |||
<p>Divers immediate<lb/> | |||
Judicatories may be<lb/> | |||
in one subdistrict.</p> | |||
<p>13.</p> | |||
<p>Or divers subdistricts<lb/> | |||
under one Immediate<lb/> | |||
Judicatory.</p> | |||
<p>14.</p> | |||
<p>In Election Districts<lb/> | |||
and subdistricts,<lb/> | |||
population the leading<lb/> | |||
consideration.</p><pb/> | |||
<p>XII. Judiciary Collectively.</p> | |||
<p>S.6. Fields of Service.</p> | |||
<p>Principle 1. Principle<lb/> | |||
of Judicial omnicompetence.</p> | |||
<p>Rule. By the logical<lb/> | |||
<del>Judicial</del> <add>field of service of each Judicatory</add> field all-comprehensive.</p> | |||
<p>Principle 2. Principle of <lb/> | |||
judicial <hi rend="underline">ubiquity</hi>.</p> | |||
<p>Rule. Be the local<lb/> | |||
<del>Judicial</del> field of service<lb/> | |||
of each Judiciary all<lb/> | |||
comprehensive.</p> | |||
—<lb/> | |||
<p>S<gap/>] 1. Expositive. 1.2.</p> | |||
<p>S<gap/>S 2. Omnicompetence<lb/> | |||
7.8.9.10.6.4.5.</p> | |||
<p>S2S3. Ubiquity. 3.</p> <pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
G.B. 1827. Novr. 20 copied.
Constitutional Code.
1.
Logical field of Service
nearly what in
French denominated
competence.
2.
But signification of
logical field of service
more ample, since it
comprises both person
who and things which
are subject matters of
operation.
3.
Judicatory field omnicomprehensive
and territory.
Reasons.
1. No one Judicatory
of which the Judge, in
giving effect to a just
demand, may not find
it necessary to give
effect to it in the territory
of any other judicatory.
4.
Ends of justice, contravened
by division
of the logical field
of service between
Judicatory and Judicatory.
5.
Sale argument in
favour of a logical
division is derived
from the immoralityuniversality
of the practice.
---page break---
6.
Existing system a
labyrinth in which
the mind is bewildered.
II. 1 7.
Omnicompetence
necessary.
II.5
Of the opposite exclusionary
justificative
cause, none.
8.
Efficient cause, primæval
barbarism.
II. 3. 9.
Evil effects.
1. Expense.
set of
By the second independent/judicatories.
expense doubled.
II. 34 10.
2. Uncertainty and
uncognoscibility.
In every different
sort of Judicatory,
ways for coming at
the truth different.
yet most apt way
there can not be more
than me.
Under every existing
system all may be,
no more than one
can be, comparatively
apt.
Under the existing
system, aberrations
multitudinous and
various.
II.56
For each of them, to
him by whom the existence
of a justificative
cause is alledged,
it belongs to exhibit it.
---page break---
1826. March 12
11.
Judicial division
of the territory into
districts and subdistricts.
12.
Divers immediate
Judicatories may be
in one subdistrict.
13.
Or divers subdistricts
under one Immediate
Judicatory.
14.
In Election Districts
and subdistricts,
population the leading
consideration.
---page break---
XII. Judiciary Collectively.
S.6. Fields of Service.
Principle 1. Principle
of Judicial omnicompetence.
Rule. By the logical
Judicial field of service of each Judicatory field all-comprehensive.
Principle 2. Principle of
judicial ubiquity.
Rule. Be the local
Judicial field of service
of each Judiciary all
comprehensive.
—
S] 1. Expositive. 1.2.
SS 2. Omnicompetence
7.8.9.10.6.4.5.
S2S3. Ubiquity. 3.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/042/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-03-12 |
1-14 |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
147 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls |
|||
|
13070 |
|||
