JB/034/058/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/058/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/034/058/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/058/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/058/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. Sept. 10<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head></p>
 
<p>126.<lb/>
 
&#9758;  Marginals here<lb/>
 
III.  Feature in Jury, good.<lb/>
In Quasi Jury, bad.<lb/>
Introduction.<lb/>
Stated already, aptitude<lb/>
relative only.<lb/>
So far as laws are bad,<lb/>
aptitude in Jury trial<lb/>
for giving effect to them,<lb/>
a bad feature:  aptitude<lb/>
for preventing the effect,<lb/>
good.<lb/>
Anglicé Constitution regarding<lb/>
laws can not<lb/>
but be bad.  See <hi rend="underline">Rationale</hi><lb/>
to the 5. <hi rend="underline">Constitutive</hi>.</p>
<p>127.<lb/>
So far as the law gives the<lb/>
ruling few the power of<lb/>
preserving and encreasing<lb/>
the sinister sacrifice,<lb/>
whatever contributes<lb/>
to weaken the efficiency<lb/>
of them is useful.  This<lb/>
does in that quarter the<lb/>
absolute over possessed<lb/>
by the Jury over the result<lb/>
of the suit.</p>
<p>128.<lb/>
So as to Judges.  Were the<lb/>
law, as to it's most important<lb/>
branch, conducive<lb/>
to greatest happiness,<lb/>
&amp;c. the apter the<lb/>
Judges for giving effect<lb/>
to it the better:  in the<lb/>
opposite case, the worse.<lb/>
But Anglicé, the law<lb/>
is adverse to greatest<lb/>
happiness:  it has for it's<lb/>
object and effect, sacrifice<lb/>
of greatest number's<lb/>
happiness to d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> of<lb/>
the makers and those in<lb/>
league with them.</p>
<p>129.<lb/>
Anglicé, under Legislative,<lb/>
Judges have themselves<lb/>
been makers of<lb/>
Common Law:  they have<lb/>
therefore, for their own<lb/>
benefit, made it as<lb/>
<add>predatory</add></p>
<pb/>
<p>129 contin<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi><lb/>
predatory and oppressive<lb/>
as possible.  Making it<lb/>
impossible for men to<lb/>
know the rule of action,<lb/>
that from not knowing<lb/>
it, they may transgress<lb/>
it, and for transgressing,<lb/>
be prosecuted and punished.</p>
<p>130.<lb/>
Thus Anglicé, nine<lb/>
tenths outlawed:  Hibernicé,<lb/>
still more:<lb/>
Anglicé, moral sanction<lb/>
affords some<lb/>
  to legal;  Hibernicé,<lb/>
not.</p>
<p>131.<lb/>
If this is not corruption,<lb/>
nothing is.</p>
<p>132.<lb/>
In the worst system of<lb/>
law, some power can<lb/>
not but be productive<lb/>
of some benefit;  witness<lb/>
those, by which protection<lb/>
is afforded ag<hi rend="superscript">st</hi><lb/>
private injuries by<lb/>
resistible adversaries:<lb/>
so far, whatever sends to<lb/>
diminish the effect, is<lb/>
proportionably mischievous.</p>
<p>133.<lb/>
Not so, in so far as it<lb/>
has for it's object or effect,<lb/>
the encrease of the<lb/>
sinister sacrifice:  whatever<lb/>
diminishes this<lb/>
sinister effect is beneficial.</p>
<p>134.<lb/>
A certain degree of insecurity<lb/>
against all adversaries<lb/>
may be of<lb/>
use, if while it encreases<lb/>
depredation and<lb/>
oppression, by resistible<lb/>
<add>adversaries,</add></p>
<pb/>
<p>134. contin<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi><lb/>
adversaries, it saves<lb/>
men from still greater<lb/>
by irresistible ones.</p>
<p>135.<lb/>
Such, by reason of the<lb/>
inaptitude of Jurors,<lb/>
is the effect of the part<lb/>
they have in judicature.</p>
<p>136.<lb/>
But of no such expensive<lb/>
remedy is there<lb/>
any need.  The Quasi<lb/>
Jury System gives a<lb/>
more effectual remedy,<lb/>
without any of<lb/>
this expence.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:35, 18 February 2022

Click Here To Edit

1823. Sept. 10
Constitutional Code

126.
☞ Marginals here
III. Feature in Jury, good.
In Quasi Jury, bad.
Introduction.
Stated already, aptitude
relative only.
So far as laws are bad,
aptitude in Jury trial
for giving effect to them,
a bad feature: aptitude
for preventing the effect,
good.
Anglicé Constitution regarding
laws can not
but be bad. See Rationale
to the 5. Constitutive.

127.
So far as the law gives the
ruling few the power of
preserving and encreasing
the sinister sacrifice,
whatever contributes
to weaken the efficiency
of them is useful. This
does in that quarter the
absolute over possessed
by the Jury over the result
of the suit.

128.
So as to Judges. Were the
law, as to it's most important
branch, conducive
to greatest happiness,
&c. the apter the
Judges for giving effect
to it the better: in the
opposite case, the worse.
But Anglicé, the law
is adverse to greatest
happiness: it has for it's
object and effect, sacrifice
of greatest number's
happiness to do. of
the makers and those in
league with them.

129.
Anglicé, under Legislative,
Judges have themselves
been makers of
Common Law: they have
therefore, for their own
benefit, made it as
predatory


---page break---

129 contind.
predatory and oppressive
as possible. Making it
impossible for men to
know the rule of action,
that from not knowing
it, they may transgress
it, and for transgressing,
be prosecuted and punished.

130.
Thus Anglicé, nine
tenths outlawed: Hibernicé,
still more:
Anglicé, moral sanction
affords some
to legal; Hibernicé,
not.

131.
If this is not corruption,
nothing is.

132.
In the worst system of
law, some power can
not but be productive
of some benefit; witness
those, by which protection
is afforded agst
private injuries by
resistible adversaries:
so far, whatever sends to
diminish the effect, is
proportionably mischievous.

133.
Not so, in so far as it
has for it's object or effect,
the encrease of the
sinister sacrifice: whatever
diminishes this
sinister effect is beneficial.

134.
A certain degree of insecurity
against all adversaries
may be of
use, if while it encreases
depredation and
oppression, by resistible
adversaries,


---page break---

134. contind.
adversaries, it saves
men from still greater
by irresistible ones.

135.
Such, by reason of the
inaptitude of Jurors,
is the effect of the part
they have in judicature.

136.
But of no such expensive
remedy is there
any need. The Quasi
Jury System gives a
more effectual remedy,
without any of
this expence.


Identifier: | JB/034/058/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

126-136

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

058

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d16

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10332

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in