JB/121/438/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/438/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/438/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/438/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->1 Apr 1802<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Dispensing Power</head></p>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">But why</hi> says Your Lordship (for I can not<lb/>
 
expect <add>to find</add> in Your Lordship a willing censor of Your<lb/>
 
Lordships most noble President and Colleague) <hi rend="underline">why</hi><lb/>
says Your Lordship <hi rend="underline">produce this letter as a proof <add>evidence</add> of a criminal intention, when the intention which<lb/>
you impute <add>might</add> supposing it entertained and supposing<lb/>
it criminal, have been carried into effect altogether<lb/>
as easily without it?</hi></p>
<p>My Lord – in the first place <add>thus much is indeed true</add> with submission<lb/>
the intention might have been carried into effect<lb/>
without this individual letter – without any letter<lb/>
at all from the Duke of Portland – but it is not<lb/>
true that it could have been carried into effect without<lb/>
that course of perfidy and treachery or at<lb/>
lease that course of palpably unjustifiable delay and <add>studied delay procrastination and secret but</add><lb/>
<del>procrastination</del> <add><del>studied</del> elaborate obstruction</add> of which that helps to compose <add>make up</add> the<lb/>
evidence.</p>
<p>I have already shown <add>submitted to</add> Your Lordship the reasons<lb/>
why the authority requisite to <add>give a legal</add> sanction to the relinquishment<lb/>
could not commodiously if at all have<lb/>
been obtained from Parliament:  therefore it was that<lb/>
rather than be altogether without a sanction, the<lb/>
Treasury called in the Duke of Portland, and from<lb/>
him <del>th</del> obtained that sort of <unclear>mesh</unclear> sanction – the
illegal sanction which was afforded to them by the<lb/>
series <add>chain</add> of letters of which this was the first – of which<lb/>
this letter <add>still</add> constitutes a link, glad as they doubtless would<lb/>
be to get rid of it.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:16, 11 March 2022

'Click Here To Edit

1 Apr 1802
Dispensing Power

But why says Your Lordship (for I can not
expect to find in Your Lordship a willing censor of Your
Lordships most noble President and Colleague) why
says Your Lordship produce this letter as a proof evidence of a criminal intention, when the intention which
you impute might supposing it entertained and supposing
it criminal, have been carried into effect altogether
as easily without it?

My Lord – in the first place thus much is indeed true with submission
the intention might have been carried into effect
without this individual letter – without any letter
at all from the Duke of Portland – but it is not
true that it could have been carried into effect without
that course of perfidy and treachery or at
lease that course of palpably unjustifiable delay and studied delay procrastination and secret but
procrastination studied elaborate obstruction of which that helps to compose make up the
evidence.

I have already shown submitted to Your Lordship the reasons
why the authority requisite to give a legal sanction to the relinquishment
could not commodiously if at all have
been obtained from Parliament: therefore it was that
rather than be altogether without a sanction, the
Treasury called in the Duke of Portland, and from
him th obtained that sort of mesh sanction – the illegal sanction which was afforded to them by the
series chain of letters of which this was the first – of which
this letter still constitutes a link, glad as they doubtless would
be to get rid of it.


Identifier: | JB/121/438/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

438

Info in main headings field

Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F31

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in