JB/106/179/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/179/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/179/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/179/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->14 May 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Place <add>Seat</add> justice as high as you will, you will always<lb/>
 
find, that on pain of <del>abjuring</del> an utter abjuration of all <add>the</add> use<lb/>
 
of reason, of all regard for mankind, yourself included, you<lb/>
 
must place utility still higher. <add>beyond it and above it.</add>  It is only by arguments<lb/>
bearing reference to <hi rend="underline">utility</hi> that propositions bearing<lb/>
reference <add>on the face of it</add> to justice can be supported or combated.  And<lb/>
if so it happens than a proposition having reference on<lb/>
the face of it be <del>ju</del> utility can consistently with reason<lb/>
be supported or combated by an argument bearing reference<lb/>
on the face of it to justice, it is only in so far as<lb/>
the word justice is translated into the word utility – in so<lb/>
far as that which has been and to be conformable to utility<lb/>
is said on other accounts to <del><gap/></del> be in a greater degree<lb/>
unconformable, or <hi rend="underline">vice versâ</hi>.
</p>
<p>Would there be common sense in the proposition that<lb/>
<del>the <gap/> being</del> <add>the happiness of every being</add> susceptible of it should <add>ought to</add> be made a sacrifice<lb/>
of to justice? what in such a case would the happiness be sacrificed<lb/>
to, but <add>to</add> the sound of the word <hi rend="underline">justice</hi>?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:43, 25 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

14 May 1807

Place Seat justice as high as you will, you will always
find, that on pain of abjuring an utter abjuration of all the use
of reason, of all regard for mankind, yourself included, you
must place utility still higher. beyond it and above it. It is only by arguments
bearing reference to utility that propositions bearing
reference on the face of it to justice can be supported or combated. And
if so it happens than a proposition having reference on
the face of it be ju utility can consistently with reason
be supported or combated by an argument bearing reference
on the face of it to justice, it is only in so far as
the word justice is translated into the word utility – in so
far as that which has been and to be conformable to utility
is said on other accounts to be in a greater degree
unconformable, or vice versâ.

Would there be common sense in the proposition that
the being the happiness of every being susceptible of it should ought to be made a sacrifice
of to justice? what in such a case would the happiness be sacrificed
to, but to the sound of the word justice?


Identifier: | JB/106/179/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-05-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

23

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

179

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34767

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in