JB/106/180/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/180/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/180/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/180/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->14 May 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Take for example the dictate of justice which is supposed<lb/>
 
to say – <hi rend="underline">fulfil your engagements</hi>.  It has already<lb/>
 
been shown that <del>the</del> from the rule of <del><gap/></del> natural justice<lb/>
 
if it be one, defalcations, and three of vast extent, must<lb/>
be made on the authority of the principle of utility, or that<lb/>
society must <add>will every where</add> go to wreck.</p>
<p>But <add>moreover</add> not only is this dictate of justice combated,<lb/>
<del>and with advantage</del> overthrown over-rated as above, to<lb/>
a great extent by the principle of utility, but when<lb/>
attached, in so far as it is not over ruled, it is to the<lb/>
same principle that it must look for its sole, its necessary<lb/>
support.</p>
<p>A man ought to fulfil his engagements:  in case of<lb/>
failure the legislator <add>and the Judge</add> ought to compel him to fulfil his<lb/>
engagements.  Why?  Because engagement is the foremost<lb/>
of mutual service.  In <add>the performance of</add> doing <del>the</del> one act whereby an<lb/>
engagement entered into by me with you and in your favour<lb/>
has been fulfilled, I <del>can</del> render you a correspondent<lb/>
service.  Labour performed for the benefit of another is <unclear>sooner</unclear><lb/>
rendered to him.  If no engagements were fulfilled as engagements<lb/>
could be entered into, no labour (in any proportion<lb/>
worth regarding as the <unclear>view</unclear>) done by any one man for any<lb/>
other:  of the mass of wealth at present existing in any<lb/>
country, all that which owes its birth to labour done by<lb/>
one man for the benefit of another in virtue of a mutual<lb/>
engagement entered into between them for that purpose, would be to be <add>in future</add><lb/>
defalcated <add>cast off</add>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:49, 25 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

14 May 1807

Take for example the dictate of justice which is supposed
to say – fulfil your engagements. It has already
been shown that the from the rule of natural justice
if it be one, defalcations, and three of vast extent, must
be made on the authority of the principle of utility, or that
society must will every where go to wreck.

But moreover not only is this dictate of justice combated,
and with advantage overthrown over-rated as above, to
a great extent by the principle of utility, but when
attached, in so far as it is not over ruled, it is to the
same principle that it must look for its sole, its necessary
support.

A man ought to fulfil his engagements: in case of
failure the legislator and the Judge ought to compel him to fulfil his
engagements. Why? Because engagement is the foremost
of mutual service. In the performance of doing the one act whereby an
engagement entered into by me with you and in your favour
has been fulfilled, I can render you a correspondent
service. Labour performed for the benefit of another is sooner
rendered to him. If no engagements were fulfilled as engagements
could be entered into, no labour (in any proportion
worth regarding as the view) done by any one man for any
other: of the mass of wealth at present existing in any
country, all that which owes its birth to labour done by
one man for the benefit of another in virtue of a mutual
engagement entered into between them for that purpose, would be to be in future
defalcated cast off.


Identifier: | JB/106/180/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-05-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

24-26

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

180

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34768

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in