JB/106/312/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/312/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/312/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/312/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>1821 Ag. 18<lb/>
<p>1821 Aug. 18<lb/>
<!-- pencil --><head>Codification Offer</head></p>
<!-- pencil --><head>Codification Offer</head></p>
<p>&sect;. 7  The greatest happiness of the greatest  
<p>&sect;. 7  The greatest happiness of the greatest number requires<lb/>
</p>
that the work, being the work of a single hand and known<lb/>
 
to be so, it be known whose that hand is.</p>
<p>The reasons are manifest.</p>
<p>1.  Unless it be known where the hand is by whom the<lb/>
instrument has been <del>drawn</del> <add>constructed, <del>the</del></add> responsibility <del>to <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
in – responsibility <add>so often <gap/></add></del> the indispensable security <del>for good<lb/>
workmanship</del> <add>so often spoken of</add> has no <del>place</del> existence having no object<lb/>
to which it can attach itself.</p>
<p>2.  Unless it be known <del>whose hand</del> who the individual<lb/>
is of whose hand the instrument is the work<lb/>
it can not <del>strictly speaking</del> be known to be the work<lb/>
or no more than a single hand.  The truth is – that<lb/>
strictly speaking, <add>no</add> such knowledge is <del>not</del> possible.  All<lb/>
that in relation to the matter can be known is –<lb/>
that by compleat authority <del>it has been declared</del> <add>declaration has to this effect been made</add><lb/>
namely This <add>man</add> (naming him) is the man by whom the<lb/>
instrument has been constructed.  <del>But when the individual</del> <add>The only difference is – that <unclear>who</unclear> by <del>competent</del> such use <unclear>thereby</unclear></add><lb/>
<del>in question and <gap/> of the</del><lb/>
<add>indication of</add> a particular individual is <add>thus</add> in the usual manner <del><gap/><lb/>
<gap/> <gap/></del> <add>given</add> the consequence is – that <del>by <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> by <gap/> unless by that same individual</del><lb/>
so long as the indication <del>thus given</del> stands uncontradicted,<lb/>
the responsibility in question attaches upon him of course:<lb/>
<del>and</del> <add>and it</add> applies itself <del>to</del> <add>in proof of</add> the truth of this circumstance, as well as to<lb/>
the work itself:  likewise, if <del>on the other hand</del> the declaration were no<lb/>
more <unclear>theirs</unclear> then, namely<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">The work is the work of<lb/>
a single hand</hi>, the hand<lb/>
not being named, the circumstance<lb/>
of the concealment<lb/>
would <del>naturally</del> <add>be apt to</add><lb/>
operate in disproof of the<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> facts that <unclear>they</unclear><lb/>
<unclear>more</unclear> <gap/> <del>the</del> and imperfectly declared.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 00:04, 1 April 2022

Click Here To Edit

1821 Aug. 18
Codification Offer

§. 7 The greatest happiness of the greatest number requires
that the work, being the work of a single hand and known
to be so, it be known whose that hand is.

The reasons are manifest.

1. Unless it be known where the hand is by whom the
instrument has been drawn constructed, the responsibility to
in – responsibility so often
the indispensable security for good
workmanship
so often spoken of has no place existence having no object
to which it can attach itself.

2. Unless it be known whose hand who the individual
is of whose hand the instrument is the work
it can not strictly speaking be known to be the work
or no more than a single hand. The truth is – that
strictly speaking, no such knowledge is not possible. All
that in relation to the matter can be known is –
that by compleat authority it has been declared declaration has to this effect been made
namely This man (naming him) is the man by whom the
instrument has been constructed. But when the individual The only difference is – that who by competent such use thereby
in question and of the
indication of a particular individual is thus in the usual manner
given the consequence is – that by
by unless by that same individual

so long as the indication thus given stands uncontradicted,
the responsibility in question attaches upon him of course:
and and it applies itself to in proof of the truth of this circumstance, as well as to
the work itself: likewise, if on the other hand the declaration were no
more theirs then, namely
The work is the work of
a single hand
, the hand
not being named, the circumstance
of the concealment
would naturally be apt to
operate in disproof of the
facts that they
more the and imperfectly declared.


Identifier: | JB/106/312/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1821-08-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

1 continued, 2

Box

106

Main Headings

codification proposal (codification offer)

Folio number

312

Info in main headings field

codification offer

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

verso

Page Numbering

d25 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

349910001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in