JB/106/314/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/314/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/314/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/314/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1821 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 12<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Codification Offer</head></p>
 
<p>Recapitulation of the matter<lb/>
 
&sect;.  Argument, respecting the choice of hands, recapitulation.<lb/>
 
Choice of hands – Recapitulation<lb/>
Recapitulation</p>
<p>Draughtsman single, Draughtsman <del><gap/></del> foreigners<lb/>
<add>rather</add> than <del>a</del> native Draughtsmanship gratuitous <add>service work</add> – <add>between</add> all those<lb/>
several points <add>provinces</add> the connection it has been seen is most<lb/>
intimate:  they had they had all all of them in concurrence<lb/>
to one common end:  <del>while</del> <add>an</add> end which has too<lb/>
often been mentioned to need mentioning here.</p>
<p>What now remains is – to bring into one <add>comparative</add> view the<lb/>
grounds on which they are respectively advocated and<lb/>
recommended.</p>
<p>The work in question is the original draught:  nothing<lb/>
beyond it.  For the original draught, hand but one for<lb/>
the <del>revi</del> amendment of it hands the more the better.</p>
<p>The object is to rid of the <add>sinister</add> influence which the<lb/>
several sinister interest and <add>general and local</add> correspondent interest-begotten<lb/>
prejudice as well as other prejudices tend to <unclear>exercise</unclear><lb/>
in it:  sinister interest, by what the aptitude <add>in proportion to the efficiency</add> of the<lb/>
workman and thence of the work <del>as</del> considered in a moral<lb/>
<del>point of view, prejudice by which</del> as well as<lb/>
an intellectual point of view can not fail to be<lb/>
impaired.  <del><gap/></del> To the sinister operation of these causes<lb/>
of inaptitude, the constitution <add>nature</add> of <add>human</add> society <del>and</del> offers <add>present</add> one<lb/>
check, the proposed rationale <add><del>have for the first time,</del> the particular nature of the present design</add> another.  That which the<lb/>
constitution <add>nature</add> of human society offers is the controuling <add>tutelary</add> influence<lb/>
of public opinion:  that which the particular<lb/>
plan here in question offers, is the rationale:  the obligation<lb/>
of attaching to such distinguishable arrangement the considerations<lb/>
by which the opinion <add>has been produced</add> of its being in a higher degree<lb/>
contributory to the greatest happiness of the greatest number.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:26, 1 April 2022

Click Here To Edit

1821 Decr. 12
Codification Offer

Recapitulation of the matter
§. Argument, respecting the choice of hands, recapitulation.
Choice of hands – Recapitulation
Recapitulation

Draughtsman single, Draughtsman foreigners
rather than a native Draughtsmanship gratuitous service workbetween all those
several points provinces the connection it has been seen is most
intimate: they had they had all all of them in concurrence
to one common end: while an end which has too
often been mentioned to need mentioning here.

What now remains is – to bring into one comparative view the
grounds on which they are respectively advocated and
recommended.

The work in question is the original draught: nothing
beyond it. For the original draught, hand but one for
the revi amendment of it hands the more the better.

The object is to rid of the sinister influence which the
several sinister interest and general and local correspondent interest-begotten
prejudice as well as other prejudices tend to exercise
in it: sinister interest, by what the aptitude in proportion to the efficiency of the
workman and thence of the work as considered in a moral
point of view, prejudice by which as well as
an intellectual point of view can not fail to be
impaired. To the sinister operation of these causes
of inaptitude, the constitution nature of human society and offers present one
check, the proposed rationale have for the first time, the particular nature of the present design another. That which the
constitution nature of human society offers is the controuling tutelary influence
of public opinion: that which the particular
plan here in question offers, is the rationale: the obligation
of attaching to such distinguishable arrangement the considerations
by which the opinion has been produced of its being in a higher degree
contributory to the greatest happiness of the greatest number.


Identifier: | JB/106/314/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1821-12-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

106

Main Headings

codification proposal (codification offer)

Folio number

314

Info in main headings field

codification offer

Image

002

Titles

recapitulation of the matter / argument reflecting the choice of hands, recapitulation / choice of hands - recapitulation / recapitulation

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

verso

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

349910003

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in