JB/106/217/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/217/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/217/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/217/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->27 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>As between the Committee and the House itself and the<lb/>
 
Committee <del>the</del> <add>an</add> appointment <del>or</del> if made at all must <add>will</add> be<lb/>
 
made either by priority of date <add>the order of time</add>, or by selection, or by<lb/>
 
lot.</p>
<p>In regard to <del>such</del> the existing arrear, priority of time<lb/>
presents itself as being <del>at the</del> not only the most obvious<lb/>
as well as only usual principle, but the most conformable<lb/>
to the ends of justice.</p>
<p>But in regard to the growing influx <del>not only</del> <add>the <unclear>distinction</unclear></add><lb/>
between bonâ fide Appeals and malâ fide Appeals is sufficeint<lb/>
<add><del><gap/> but</del></add> to present not <del>only</del> selection only, but even lot as<lb/>
preferable.</p>
<p>1.  As to selection the main or rather sole <add>sole or at least the main</add> object <add>here</add> pointed<lb/>
out by <add>at by the ends of</add> justice is the prevention of malâ fide Appeals.</p>
<p>Under this denomination comes every Appeal, in the instances<lb/>
of which <del>the Appellant</del> conscious of <del>the</del> a total want of merits<lb/>
and having no expectation of a decision in his favour, the Appellant<lb/>
in the presentation of his Appeal has no other object<lb/>
than the profit <add>advantage</add>, in certain <add>some</add> circumstances <add>put into his pocket by</add> a sure <add>certain</add> one,<lb/>
derivable <add>resulting</add> from <add>the</add> delay.  In this case <del>the Appeal when the<lb/>
time comes for a hearing</del> when <add>in the order of priority</add> it comes to the turn of the <gap/><lb/>
to be heard, <del>the <add>be <gap/> the</add> Appellant either withdraws</del> it is either<lb/>
<add>on the petition of the Appellant</add> withdrawn, or for want or prosecution dismissed.  By this means<lb/>
the costs of a hearing are saved to the Appellant himself, and<lb/>
the reproach of conscious <add>self-conscious</add> injustice, is saved <add>not only</add> to the Appellant and <add>but to</add><lb/>
his professional Advisers.  Thus by adding <add>the addition of</add> up <add>together</add> the two both<lb/>
Appeals withdrawn and Appeals dismissed may at all times<lb/>
be seen <add>found</add> to a <add>degree of</add> correctness sufficient for every practicable purpose<lb/>
the number of <del>number</del> Appeals coming under the description of<lb/>
malâ fide Appeals, as above.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:02, 1 April 2022

Click Here To Edit

27 Decr 1807

As between the Committee and the House itself and the
Committee the an appointment or if made at all must will be
made either by priority of date the order of time, or by selection, or by
lot.

In regard to such the existing arrear, priority of time
presents itself as being at the not only the most obvious
as well as only usual principle, but the most conformable
to the ends of justice.

But in regard to the growing influx not only the distinction
between bonâ fide Appeals and malâ fide Appeals is sufficeint
but to present not only selection only, but even lot as
preferable.

1. As to selection the main or rather sole sole or at least the main object here pointed
out by at by the ends of justice is the prevention of malâ fide Appeals.

Under this denomination comes every Appeal, in the instances
of which the Appellant conscious of the a total want of merits
and having no expectation of a decision in his favour, the Appellant
in the presentation of his Appeal has no other object
than the profit advantage, in certain some circumstances put into his pocket by a sure certain one,
derivable resulting from the delay. In this case the Appeal when the
time comes for a hearing
when in the order of priority it comes to the turn of the
to be heard, the be the Appellant either withdraws it is either
on the petition of the Appellant withdrawn, or for want or prosecution dismissed. By this means
the costs of a hearing are saved to the Appellant himself, and
the reproach of conscious self-conscious injustice, is saved not only to the Appellant and but to
his professional Advisers. Thus by adding the addition of up together the two both
Appeals withdrawn and Appeals dismissed may at all times
be seen found to a degree of correctness sufficient for every practicable purpose
the number of number Appeals coming under the description of
malâ fide Appeals, as above.


Identifier: | JB/106/217/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-12-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

217

Info in main headings field

judicial

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34805

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in