JB/081/396/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/396/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
WilsonC (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1829. May 4.<lb/>
 
Petitions.<lb/>
 
Supplement.<lb/>
&sect; 2. Elucidation.<lb/>
History &amp; Aetiology.</head>
<note>32<lb/>
Groundless the notion<lb/>
that the regular more<lb/>
conducive than the<lb/>
summary to right<lb/>
division</note>
<p>Sole mode well adapted to the elicitation<lb/>
of the truth and right of a case, the regular mode:<lb/>
the summary, no better than a makeshift, by which, to<lb/>
save delay and expense; a comparatively ill-adapted<lb/>
mode is employed: &#x2014; by all lawyers, such is the conception<lb/>
endeavoured to be implanted; such by most<lb/>
lawyers &#x2014; no great wonder is by all, actually entertained.<lb/>
In judicature as in mechanics: a sort of<lb/>
choice or compromise. In mechanics, what you<lb/>
gain in time you lose in power; what gain in<lb/>
power you lose in time; in judicature, what<lb/>
you gain in respect of the collateral, you lose<lb/>
in respect of the direct, ends of justice. So much<lb/>
for imagination. Is this so in reality? Not it<lb/>
indeed: an illusion altogether: the loser your examination,<lb/>
the clearer will be your conviction. Yes:<lb/>
in the summary course you will see not<lb/>
only the promptest and cheapest course that<lb/>
can be taken for coming at the truth, but<lb/>
the surest.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 17:31, 25 April 2022

Click Here To Edit

1829. May 4.
Petitions.
Supplement.
§ 2. Elucidation.
History & Aetiology.
32
Groundless the notion
that the regular more
conducive than the
summary to right
division

Sole mode well adapted to the elicitation
of the truth and right of a case, the regular mode:
the summary, no better than a makeshift, by which, to
save delay and expense; a comparatively ill-adapted
mode is employed: — by all lawyers, such is the conception
endeavoured to be implanted; such by most
lawyers — no great wonder is by all, actually entertained.
In judicature as in mechanics: a sort of
choice or compromise. In mechanics, what you
gain in time you lose in power; what gain in
power you lose in time; in judicature, what
you gain in respect of the collateral, you lose
in respect of the direct, ends of justice. So much
for imagination. Is this so in reality? Not it
indeed: an illusion altogether: the loser your examination,
the clearer will be your conviction. Yes:
in the summary course you will see not
only the promptest and cheapest course that
can be taken for coming at the truth, but
the surest.



Identifier: | JB/081/396/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-04-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

32

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

396

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

1828

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

26183

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in