★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/013/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/091/013/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->18 March 1807</p> | |||
<p><del>Is it then</del> the word <hi rend="underline">frivolous</hi> being <add>thus</add> employed in the <add>to express to form</add><lb/> | |||
character of an <hi rend="underline">attribute</hi>, to <add>of instead</add> the word <hi rend="underline">appeal</hi> <del>considered<lb/> | |||
as employed to express the subject will when subjected to</del> <add>the grounds and reasons of the appeal be considered the object designated</add><lb/> | |||
<del>the source <gap/> by the</del> in the character of the correspondent<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">subject</hi>, <add>the expression when</add> when compared with the <add>above</add> same standard, will appear<lb/> | |||
equally incompetent <add>ill qualified</add> to lead to useful practice.</p> | |||
<p>Those grounds and reasons may be now <del>so</del> frivolous<lb/> | |||
ever so <del><gap/></del> insufficient in point of reason to warrant the<lb/> | |||
conclusion built upon them <add>drawn from them</add>, and yet <add>on the point of the suitor on whose behalf they are employed</add> be unaccompanied<lb/> | |||
with <hi rend="underline">mala fides</hi>. It may <add>even</add> happen that they are not so<lb/> | |||
much as accompanied with <hi rend="underline">temerity</hi>. For <del>the</del> be they<lb/> | |||
ever so frivolous <del>it</del> <add>what</add> may happen is that they are the fruit<lb/> | |||
of the ingenuity of the suitors lawyer, <add>in</add> and forasmuch as <del>at</del><lb/> | |||
<add>where law is concerned</add> it is not endurable that non-lawyers <add>in general</add> should <del>be as</del> hold themselves<lb/> | |||
wiser than the laws, that is than the lawyers by whom <del>they and <add>were</add></del><lb/> | |||
on pretence of being declared they were made, or at least without<lb/> | |||
imputation of rashness may a suitor be allowed to<lb/> | |||
regard the <del>opinion</del> <add>wisdom of the lawyer of his choice</add> of his own lawyer as superior to his own.<lb/> | |||
On the other hand true it is, that the more frivolous the<lb/> | |||
grounds, produced in support of an Appeal or any other<lb/> | |||
legal application, appear <del>to the</del> in the eyes of him to whom<lb/> | |||
it belongs to judge of them, the stronger will be his reason<lb/> | |||
for regarding the application as accompanied <add>tinctured</add> either with<lb/> | |||
temerity or even with <hi rend="superscript">mala fides</hi>.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
18 March 1807
Is it then the word frivolous being thus employed in the to express to form
character of an attribute, to of instead the word appeal considered
as employed to express the subject will when subjected to the grounds and reasons of the appeal be considered the object designated
the source by the in the character of the correspondent
subject, the expression when when compared with the above same standard, will appear
equally incompetent ill qualified to lead to useful practice.
Those grounds and reasons may be now so frivolous
ever so insufficient in point of reason to warrant the
conclusion built upon them drawn from them, and yet on the point of the suitor on whose behalf they are employed be unaccompanied
with mala fides. It may even happen that they are not so
much as accompanied with temerity. For the be they
ever so frivolous it what may happen is that they are the fruit
of the ingenuity of the suitors lawyer, in and forasmuch as at
where law is concerned it is not endurable that non-lawyers in general should be as hold themselves
wiser than the laws, that is than the lawyers by whom they and were
on pretence of being declared they were made, or at least without
imputation of rashness may a suitor be allowed to
regard the opinion wisdom of the lawyer of his choice of his own lawyer as superior to his own.
On the other hand true it is, that the more frivolous the
grounds, produced in support of an Appeal or any other
legal application, appear to the in the eyes of him to whom
it belongs to judge of them, the stronger will be his reason
for regarding the application as accompanied tinctured either with
temerity or even with mala fides.
|
Identifier: | JB/091/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1807-03-18 |
|||
|
091 |
scotch reform |
||
|
013 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
iping 1804 |
||
|
bernardino rivadavia |
|||
|
1804 |
|||
|
29009 |
|||
