JB/091/012/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/091/012/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/091/012/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/012/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/012/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->March 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Compared with the above standard, the word <hi rend="underline">frivolous</hi><lb/>
 
presents at least equal difficulty, and seems at least as<lb/>
 
ill qualified for expressing what it was desirable it should<lb/>
 
express.</p>
<p>It is that the value <add>of the article</add> in demand is trifling – so trifling<lb/>
as not to be worth the care of the Legislator or the Judge?<lb/>
My Lord, there exists no such article.  All value is relative.<lb/>
There are those in this country, each of them as well entitled<lb/>
to the care of government as any other – there are those in this<lb/>
country to each of whom a shilling is of as much importance<lb/>
as £50 to each of a number of others that might<lb/>
be named:  and moreover, take the stock of the most opulent<lb/>
corn dealer that ever existed, <add>he</add> if each <add>single</add> grain of his stock<lb/>
<del>be</del> out of the protection of the law, so is the whole. <add>then so is the whole.</add>  Take<lb/>
any single grain, if he to whom it rightfully belongs is<lb/>
in the wrong for claiming <add>demanding</add> it, how much more in the wrong<lb/>
is he who denies it when demanded?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:08, 6 May 2022

Click Here To Edit

March 1807

Compared with the above standard, the word frivolous
presents at least equal difficulty, and seems at least as
ill qualified for expressing what it was desirable it should
express.

It is that the value of the article in demand is trifling – so trifling
as not to be worth the care of the Legislator or the Judge?
My Lord, there exists no such article. All value is relative.
There are those in this country, each of them as well entitled
to the care of government as any other – there are those in this
country to each of whom a shilling is of as much importance
as £50 to each of a number of others that might
be named: and moreover, take the stock of the most opulent
corn dealer that ever existed, he if each single grain of his stock
be out of the protection of the law, so is the whole. then so is the whole. Take
any single grain, if he to whom it rightfully belongs is
in the wrong for claiming demanding it, how much more in the wrong
is he who denies it when demanded?


Identifier: | JB/091/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1807-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

012

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

29008

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in