★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/002/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/047/002/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>4</p> | |||
<p><head>PERJURY. Intensity of Government.</head></p> | |||
<p>For who is there that does not see <add>had perceived</add>, that there are a<lb/> | |||
thousand transactions of his within that period, even concerning<lb/> | |||
money matters, such as behave in some sort<lb/> | |||
to engage the attention, concerning the particulars of which<lb/> | |||
he could with a safe conscience give no other Answer?<lb/> | |||
We see therefore that an Answer so qualified, must<lb/> | |||
often be received: & we see that it is capable of being<lb/> | |||
<add>as</add> compleatly falsified as can be requisite. It remains therefore<lb/> | |||
that it received as a <del>proper</del> <add>compleat</add> foundation for a <del><gap/></del> charge<lb/> | |||
of Perjury: otherwise not only the general doctrine <add>obligation</add> of Evidence<lb/> | |||
but many special Law would stand naked of a sanction.<lb/> | |||
I have now one before me<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> 11 G. 3. 55. § 4</note> in which an Elector is required<lb/> | |||
to swear, amongst other things, that he is "21 years of age,<lb/> | |||
as he believes": and goes on to appoint a punishment<lb/> | |||
for swearing false: This <add>clause of</add> Punishment <add>then</add> would be nugatory<lb/> | |||
if L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Coke's doctrine were to be received.</p> | |||
<p><del>It was highly proper</del> The propriety of wording the Oath in<lb/> | |||
this manner is manifest: it can only be a matter of belief<lb/> | |||
to a man what age he is of <add>precisely</add>: and he may be plainly<lb/> | |||
convicted of not believing that he is twenty one: for example</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
4
PERJURY. Intensity of Government.
For who is there that does not see had perceived, that there are a
thousand transactions of his within that period, even concerning
money matters, such as behave in some sort
to engage the attention, concerning the particulars of which
he could with a safe conscience give no other Answer?
We see therefore that an Answer so qualified, must
often be received: & we see that it is capable of being
as compleatly falsified as can be requisite. It remains therefore
that it received as a proper compleat foundation for a charge
of Perjury: otherwise not only the general doctrine obligation of Evidence
but many special Law would stand naked of a sanction.
I have now one before me† † 11 G. 3. 55. § 4 in which an Elector is required
to swear, amongst other things, that he is "21 years of age,
as he believes": and goes on to appoint a punishment
for swearing false: This clause of Punishment then would be nugatory
if Ld Coke's doctrine were to be received.
It was highly proper The propriety of wording the Oath in
this manner is manifest: it can only be a matter of belief
to a man what age he is of precisely: and he may be plainly
convicted of not believing that he is twenty one: for example
Identifier: | JB/047/002/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
047 |
evidence |
||
002 |
perjury intensity of averment |
||
003 |
|||
text sheet |
3 |
||
recto |
/ f3 / f4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
14870 |
|||