JB/149/162/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/149/162/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/162/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/149/162/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>The worst that can be said against anonymous<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
information is, that <del>with a view</del> to the<lb/>
 
public in respect of the interest it has in the<lb/>
 
prevention of the <del>crime or</del> <add>offence and</add> the punishment of the<lb/>
 
offender, it is not <del><gap/> upon the whole</del> <add>generally speaking altogether</add> upon a<lb/>
<add>par in point of utility</add> equally serviceable with information from a person<lb/>
known, because it is <del>more liable to</del><lb/>
not so certain of being adequate to the object<lb/>
of it, viz: the <add>prevention of the offence, or the</add> bringing the offender to punishment.<lb/>
If the man were known and forthcoming, you<lb/>
might get out from him every thing he knew:<lb/>
while he remains unknown you must be content<lb/>
with what he gives you.  But <del>this</del> whatever it<lb/>
is, it may be <add>just</add> so much more than you could have<lb/>
got at all, had it not been for the <del>expedient</del> faculty<lb/>
which the informant reserved to himself of<lb/>
concealing himself:  and if what it amounts to<lb/>
<del>is</del> <add>happens to prove</add> sufficient to lead to the discovery of other evidence,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> affording a sufficient ground for conviction,<lb/>
it <del>is</del> has then all the good effects that<lb/>
information from a known Informant could have<lb/>
had.  To the public therefore <del>it</del> <add>information <del>without a name</del> from a person unknown</add> is not quite<lb/>
so good <add>desirable</add> as information <del>with a name</del> from a<lb/>
person known:  because in the latter case conviction<lb/>
may be obtained without further <add>evidence or</add> research<lb/>
which in the other case can not be.  But to the <add>with a<lb/>
view to the</add> person informed against, it is either more favourable<lb/>
to his interests than information from a person<lb/>
known, or at any rate not less so.  If he is<lb/>
innocent it is not <add>the</add> worse for him for being anonymous,<lb/>
for it is only <del>by</del> <add>upon</add> evidence <del>from</del> <add>given by</add> a known<lb/>
<add><del>person</del> witness</add></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:31, 20 May 2022

Click Here To Edit

The worst that can be said against anonymous
information is, that with a view to the
public in respect of the interest it has in the
prevention of the crime or offence and the punishment of the
offender, it is not upon the whole generally speaking altogether upon a
par in point of utility equally serviceable with information from a person
known, because it is more liable to
not so certain of being adequate to the object
of it, viz: the prevention of the offence, or the bringing the offender to punishment.
If the man were known and forthcoming, you
might get out from him every thing he knew:
while he remains unknown you must be content
with what he gives you. But this whatever it
is, it may be just so much more than you could have
got at all, had it not been for the expedient faculty
which the informant reserved to himself of
concealing himself: and if what it amounts to
is happens to prove sufficient to lead to the discovery of other evidence,
affording a sufficient ground for conviction,
it is has then all the good effects that
information from a known Informant could have
had. To the public therefore it information without a name from a person unknown is not quite
so good desirable as information with a name from a
person known: because in the latter case conviction
may be obtained without further evidence or research
which in the other case can not be. But to the with a
view to the
person informed against, it is either more favourable
to his interests than information from a person
known, or at any rate not less so. If he is
innocent it is not the worse for him for being anonymous,
for it is only by upon evidence from given by a known
person witness


Identifier: | JB/149/162/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

162

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g&ep 1794

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

50016

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in