JB/058/011/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/058/011/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/011/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/011/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->14 Apr. 1803<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>usage.  This omission so far as suggestion goes, so far as can<lb/>
 
be done by an individual without authority, will be endeavoured<lb/>
 
to be supplied in the course of the ensuing pages.  <del>Authority<lb/>
if</del></p>
<p>These things being promised, the business of this work,<lb/>
notwithstanding the extent of it <add>room it occupies</add> will be found capable of being<lb/>
comprized and announced in three simple propositions. <add>a very narrow compass..</add></p>
<p>1.  A proposition to be proved is that <add>in the <unclear>mere</unclear> view</add> for the mere purpose of<lb/>
ensuring rectitude of decision – in other words for the avoidance<lb/>
of the six inconveniences into which erroneous decision branches<lb/>
out and <gap/> itself – no species of evidence whatsoever ought<lb/>
to be excluded, in technical language that all testimony,<lb/>
that all evidence ought to be deemed competent may without<lb/>
any defalcation from the probability <add>chances</add> in favour of a right<lb/>
decision <del>in the <gap/></del> in any case and with a great addition<lb/>
to it in many cases, be deemed competent and as such<lb/>
admitted.</p>
<p>2.  Another proposition is – that <del>action in cases lots</del> <add>on the <del>case</del> score <del>either of</del></add><lb/>
<del>of evidence</del> partly of quantity partly of quality lots of evidence<lb/>
of certain descriptions may <add>be</add> notwithstanding and ought to be<lb/>
excluded.  But this rather <del>in the</del> for the avoidance of the collateral<lb/>
inconveniences of vexation, expence and delay, thus<lb/>
for the avoidance of the inconveniences <del><gap/> and</del> of the first<lb/>
order comprized under the head of wrong decision:  on<lb/>
the account not of the danger of their proving delusive, but<lb/>
of the certainty <add>appearance</add> of their being needless and superfluous.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:22, 17 June 2022

Click Here To Edit

14 Apr. 1803
Evidence

usage. This omission so far as suggestion goes, so far as can
be done by an individual without authority, will be endeavoured
to be supplied in the course of the ensuing pages. Authority
if

These things being promised, the business of this work,
notwithstanding the extent of it room it occupies will be found capable of being
comprized and announced in three simple propositions. a very narrow compass..

1. A proposition to be proved is that in the mere view for the mere purpose of
ensuring rectitude of decision – in other words for the avoidance
of the six inconveniences into which erroneous decision branches
out and itself – no species of evidence whatsoever ought
to be excluded, in technical language that all testimony,
that all evidence ought to be deemed competent may without
any defalcation from the probability chances in favour of a right
decision in the in any case and with a great addition
to it in many cases, be deemed competent and as such
admitted.

2. Another proposition is – that action in cases lots on the case score either of
of evidence partly of quantity partly of quality lots of evidence
of certain descriptions may be notwithstanding and ought to be
excluded. But this rather in the for the avoidance of the collateral
inconveniences of vexation, expence and delay, thus
for the avoidance of the inconveniences and of the first
order comprized under the head of wrong decision: on
the account not of the danger of their proving delusive, but
of the certainty appearance of their being needless and superfluous.


Identifier: | JB/058/011/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1803-04-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

011

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

18680

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in