★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/011/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/058/011/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->14 Apr. 1803<lb/> | |||
<head>Evidence</head></p> | |||
<p>usage. This omission so far as suggestion goes, so far as can<lb/> | |||
be done by an individual without authority, will be endeavoured<lb/> | |||
to be supplied in the course of the ensuing pages. <del>Authority<lb/> | |||
if</del></p> | |||
<p>These things being promised, the business of this work,<lb/> | |||
notwithstanding the extent of it <add>room it occupies</add> will be found capable of being<lb/> | |||
comprized and announced in three simple propositions. <add>a very narrow compass..</add></p> | |||
<p>1. A proposition to be proved is that <add>in the <unclear>mere</unclear> view</add> for the mere purpose of<lb/> | |||
ensuring rectitude of decision – in other words for the avoidance<lb/> | |||
of the six inconveniences into which erroneous decision branches<lb/> | |||
out and <gap/> itself – no species of evidence whatsoever ought<lb/> | |||
to be excluded, in technical language that all testimony,<lb/> | |||
that all evidence ought to be deemed competent may without<lb/> | |||
any defalcation from the probability <add>chances</add> in favour of a right<lb/> | |||
decision <del>in the <gap/></del> in any case and with a great addition<lb/> | |||
to it in many cases, be deemed competent and as such<lb/> | |||
admitted.</p> | |||
<p>2. Another proposition is – that <del>action in cases lots</del> <add>on the <del>case</del> score <del>either of</del></add><lb/> | |||
<del>of evidence</del> partly of quantity partly of quality lots of evidence<lb/> | |||
of certain descriptions may <add>be</add> notwithstanding and ought to be<lb/> | |||
excluded. But this rather <del>in the</del> for the avoidance of the collateral<lb/> | |||
inconveniences of vexation, expence and delay, thus<lb/> | |||
for the avoidance of the inconveniences <del><gap/> and</del> of the first<lb/> | |||
order comprized under the head of wrong decision: on<lb/> | |||
the account not of the danger of their proving delusive, but<lb/> | |||
of the certainty <add>appearance</add> of their being needless and superfluous.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
14 Apr. 1803
Evidence
usage. This omission so far as suggestion goes, so far as can
be done by an individual without authority, will be endeavoured
to be supplied in the course of the ensuing pages. Authority
if
These things being promised, the business of this work,
notwithstanding the extent of it room it occupies will be found capable of being
comprized and announced in three simple propositions. a very narrow compass..
1. A proposition to be proved is that in the mere view for the mere purpose of
ensuring rectitude of decision – in other words for the avoidance
of the six inconveniences into which erroneous decision branches
out and itself – no species of evidence whatsoever ought
to be excluded, in technical language that all testimony,
that all evidence ought to be deemed competent may without
any defalcation from the probability chances in favour of a right
decision in the in any case and with a great addition
to it in many cases, be deemed competent and as such
admitted.
2. Another proposition is – that action in cases lots on the case score either of
of evidence partly of quantity partly of quality lots of evidence
of certain descriptions may be notwithstanding and ought to be
excluded. But this rather in the for the avoidance of the collateral
inconveniences of vexation, expence and delay, thus
for the avoidance of the inconveniences and of the first
order comprized under the head of wrong decision: on
the account not of the danger of their proving delusive, but
of the certainty appearance of their being needless and superfluous.
Identifier: | JB/058/011/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1803-04-14 |
|||
058 |
evidence |
||
011 |
evidence |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d11 |
||
jeremy bentham |
1800 |
||
1800 |
|||
18680 |
|||