★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/009/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/058/009/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->14 Apr. 1803<lb/> | |||
<head>Evidence</head></p> | |||
<p>So far as this account of them is just, the several <del>this</del><lb/> | |||
decisions and discussions exhibited by them may all of them<lb/> | |||
be referable with propriety to the question – to the problem<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> concerning the weight of evidence:</note><lb/> | |||
concerning the weight – the persuasive force <add>to be</add> proper <add>in each instance</add> to<lb/> | |||
be allowed to <del>evidence</del> this or that <add>article or</add> species of evidence.<lb/> | |||
The account thus given of them will accordingly be found<lb/> | |||
just: so far at least as the little <add>points of</add> difference that may be found<lb/> | |||
in their respective contents will admitt of one and the same <add>of these different works will be found capable of admitting of</add><lb/> | |||
description. I say just, but to render it such, one <add>an</add> explanation<lb/> | |||
will be found requisite. To reject a piece of<lb/> | |||
evidence – not to suffer to be exhibited a <del>piece</del> document or<lb/> | |||
a testimony which <add>at the instance of</add> this or that one of the parties would, if<lb/> | |||
permission could be obtained, be exhibited in the character of a<lb/> | |||
piece of evidence – is the same thing in effect as to <add><del><gap/></del></add> say<lb/> | |||
that it should not be suffered to have any weight at all.<lb/> | |||
The decisions and discussions <add>exhibited or referred to</add> reported in these books, turn<lb/> | |||
almost exclusively on the question <add>point</add> shall the piece of evidence<lb/> | |||
on the carpet be suffered or not be suffered to be exhibited<lb/> | |||
and handed up to the Judge.</p> | |||
<p><del>In the language of the English</del> <add>From the phraseology belonging to the language at large, let</add><lb/> | |||
us now turn for a moment to the particular phraseology in use<lb/> | |||
on this occasion among English lawyers.<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> In almost every instance<lb/> | |||
that occurrs, expressed in<lb/> | |||
general language</note>. The question discussed is<lb/> | |||
with respect to the piece of evidence on the carpet, is<lb/> | |||
received or rejected: this expressed in technical language is –<lb/> | |||
the objection made to the evidence, <add>supposing it valid</add> shall it be understood to apply<lb/> | |||
to the competency of the evidence , or to its credibility.<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi> Competency and credibility<lb/> | |||
– the language confined to oral<lb/> | |||
evidence: No other <del>words</del> <add>phrases</add><lb/> | |||
the words <unclear>received</unclear> as employed.</note> If the<lb/> | |||
answer be <hi rend="underline">to the competency</hi> <add>and such be the decision</add> – this is as much as to say – the evidence<lb/> | |||
shall not be admitted: it shall be rejected, excluded: it is bad evidence.<lb/> | |||
If the answer be – <hi rend="underline">to the credibility only</hi> – this is as much as to<lb/> | |||
say the evidence shall be received: shall be admitted.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
14 Apr. 1803
Evidence
So far as this account of them is just, the several this
decisions and discussions exhibited by them may all of them
be referable with propriety to the question – to the problem⊞ ⊞ concerning the weight of evidence:
concerning the weight – the persuasive force to be proper in each instance to
be allowed to evidence this or that article or species of evidence.
The account thus given of them will accordingly be found
just: so far at least as the little points of difference that may be found
in their respective contents will admitt of one and the same of these different works will be found capable of admitting of
description. I say just, but to render it such, one an explanation
will be found requisite. To reject a piece of
evidence – not to suffer to be exhibited a piece document or
a testimony which at the instance of this or that one of the parties would, if
permission could be obtained, be exhibited in the character of a
piece of evidence – is the same thing in effect as to say
that it should not be suffered to have any weight at all.
The decisions and discussions exhibited or referred to reported in these books, turn
almost exclusively on the question point shall the piece of evidence
on the carpet be suffered or not be suffered to be exhibited
and handed up to the Judge.
In the language of the English From the phraseology belonging to the language at large, let
us now turn for a moment to the particular phraseology in use
on this occasion among English lawyers.⊞ ⊞ In almost every instance
that occurrs, expressed in
general language. The question discussed is
with respect to the piece of evidence on the carpet, is
received or rejected: this expressed in technical language is –
the objection made to the evidence, supposing it valid shall it be understood to apply
to the competency of the evidence , or to its credibility.† † Competency and credibility
– the language confined to oral
evidence: No other words phrases
the words received as employed. If the
answer be to the competency and such be the decision – this is as much as to say – the evidence
shall not be admitted: it shall be rejected, excluded: it is bad evidence.
If the answer be – to the credibility only – this is as much as to
say the evidence shall be received: shall be admitted.
Identifier: | JB/058/009/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1803-04-14 |
|||
058 |
evidence |
||
009 |
evidence |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d9 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
18678 |
|||