JB/058/149/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/149/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/149/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
the Dauphines, it was finely said by Fontenelle <add>his eulogist – Not a day but what he strove</add> every day he laboured<lb/>
the Dauphines, it was finely said by Fontenelle <add>his eulogist – Not a day but what he strove</add> every day he laboured<lb/>
more and more to render himself unnecessary.  The praise seems to have been<lb/>
more and more to render himself unnecessary.  The praise seems to have been<lb/>
 
<gap/>, but Montausier was not the depository of his pupils power, nor was<lb/>
</p>
<unclear>looked</unclear> to be.</p>
 
<p>The congruity of this object in the character of a subordinate<lb/>
 
and being that obvious <add>out of dispute</add>, what remains for <gap/> is <add>are</add> the means.</p>
<p>The three preceding maxims <add>laws of policy</add> are all subservient to this one,<lb/>
in addition to their respective peculiar <add>particular</add> uses, this use is common to<lb/>
them all.  Keep the rule of action in the dark, discourage criticism,<lb/>
promote blind admiration, be the subject what it may, what<lb/>
recipes can act <add>contribute</add> more powerful towards producing the requisite<lb/>
effect, producing in general prostration of strength in the <del>partic</del><lb/>
patient in question <add>the destined victim</add> – the public mind?</p>
<p>There remains <add>To this may be</add> two other <unclear>strokes</unclear> <add>articles medicaments</add> of policy that have not yet been<lb/>
mentioned.  1. Inculcate in the mind of the learner <add>pupil</add> a <add>blind</add> reverence<lb/>
for antiquity in genera:  for <del>the</del> law <add>jurisprudential law</add>, not merely as the work of lawyers,<lb/>
but as the work of <unclear>entrant</unclear> lawyers.  2. Ply him with false<lb/>
<del>wit:</del> <add>wit; the particular species of false wit invented by lawyer draft for the purpose</add> for though wit, true or false, is not argument, is not reason,<lb/>
it <add>either</add> may serve as a cloak to bad reason, or a substitute to good,<lb/>
and in either way <add>both way</add> be conducive to the purpose.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:08, 1 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

3 June 1805
Evidence

§. 5. 4. Weakening the men's reasoning faculties

The In law, as in religion and government, the importance of this line object of policy to the name of law is too obvious to need
insisting, in stand in need of explanation. Strong and weak are relative terms of relation
is no and less obvious for the penitent case of the lawyer than in that of the Convict
weakness of the religionist lay devotion is the strength of the
strong and weak are terms of relative
the The strength in the one part, is
as the weakness in the other. The weakness of the lay-devotee is the strength of the
as the weakness in the priest. The weakness of Lewis the 13th was the
strength of Richelieu: the weakness of Lewis the 14th was the strength
of Mazarine. Of the Duc de Montausier, the Governor of one of
the Dauphines, it was finely said by Fontenelle his eulogist – Not a day but what he strove every day he laboured
more and more to render himself unnecessary. The praise seems to have been
, but Montausier was not the depository of his pupils power, nor was
looked to be.

The congruity of this object in the character of a subordinate
and being that obvious out of dispute, what remains for is are the means.

The three preceding maxims laws of policy are all subservient to this one,
in addition to their respective peculiar particular uses, this use is common to
them all. Keep the rule of action in the dark, discourage criticism,
promote blind admiration, be the subject what it may, what
recipes can act contribute more powerful towards producing the requisite
effect, producing in general prostration of strength in the partic
patient in question the destined victim – the public mind?

There remains To this may be two other strokes articles medicaments of policy that have not yet been
mentioned. 1. Inculcate in the mind of the learner pupil a blind reverence
for antiquity in genera: for the law jurisprudential law, not merely as the work of lawyers,
but as the work of entrant lawyers. 2. Ply him with false
wit: wit; the particular species of false wit invented by lawyer draft for the purpose for though wit, true or false, is not argument, is not reason,
it either may serve as a cloak to bad reason, or a substitute to good,
and in either way both way be conducive to the purpose.


Identifier: | JB/058/149/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-06-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

149

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

weakening man's reasoning faculties

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

18818

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in