JB/058/242/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/242/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/242/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/242/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->22 Mar. 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p><add>In the bosom of a family</add> An article of food, of cloathing, an instrument employed in<lb/>
 
labour – being in the possession of one brother is laid claim to <add>claimed</add> by another:<lb/>
 
<del>who refuses</del> the possessor refuses <add>refusing</add> to give it up, their common<lb/>
father is applied to, he say who shall have it.  The father calls them<lb/>
both into his presence – each tells his story <add>states his case</add>:  but each being partial<lb/>
to himself neither of himself tells <add>brings forward</add> any more of it than suits<lb/>
the purpose of his claim.  But what each if left to himself would<lb/>
have kept back, each finds himself obliged to bring forward by the<lb/>
questions put to him <del>by</del> for that purpose by the other:  <del><gap/></del> to those questions<lb/>
neither dares <add>ventures</add> to refuse an answer, each seeing <add>foreseeing</add> that <add>by</add> <gap/><lb/>
common superior upon whose will the allowance or disallowance of the<lb/>
claim depends, that <add>by</add> this common superior, consciousness of wrong<lb/>
would be the inference drawn from silence.  The <add>disputed</add> article <del>of</del> <add>subject of the dispute</add> is<lb/>
allotted <add>adjudged</add> by the father to the complaining child, <add>plaintiff, or to the defendant,</add> or to the child complained<lb/>
against, as he sees fit.  <add>In this representation</add> Here we have the model <add>germ <unclear>sediment</unclear></add> and<lb/>
the exemplification of judicature, <add>and of judicial procedure</add> in causes of a non-penal nature.</p>
<p><del>Why <gap/></del> I found some berries on yonder bush:  I was <del>eating</del><lb/>
gathering them and eating them when my Brother came up, and<lb/>
in a line of anger called to <add>commanded</add> me to be gone <add>bid me case gathering</add>.  I would have shared<lb/>
them with him but that would not satisfy him:  <del>he said</del> he had<lb/>
discovered <del>the tree</del> <add>them</add> he said before I had and they were his.  <del><gap/></del> finding <add>Finding his<lb/>
anger <unclear>ineffectual</unclear></add> me unmoved, he fell upon me, struck me, and reduced me to the<lb/>
condition <del>in</del> which you see. <del>me.</del> Make him suffer, as he has made<lb/>
me suffer, or <del>the</del> he will <del>be continually the</del> <add>continue thus</add> repeating the ill usage, and<lb/>
I shall never be at peace.  The father calls them together <del>before him</del><lb/>
as before, hears what each has to say for himself, what each <del>thinks <gap/></del> <add>is forced to</add><lb/>
say by the questions put to him by the other:  and punishes or forbears to<lb/>
punish as he sees fit.  Here we have the germ of penal judicature,  of judicial<lb/>
procedure in <del><gap/></del> causes of a penal nature, and in that form of penal<lb/>
procedure, which among <del>the</del> German lawyers is distinguished by the name of<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">accusatorial</hi>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:19, 29 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

22 Mar. 1805
Evidence

In the bosom of a family An article of food, of cloathing, an instrument employed in
labour – being in the possession of one brother is laid claim to claimed by another:
who refuses the possessor refuses refusing to give it up, their common
father is applied to, he say who shall have it. The father calls them
both into his presence – each tells his story states his case: but each being partial
to himself neither of himself tells brings forward any more of it than suits
the purpose of his claim. But what each if left to himself would
have kept back, each finds himself obliged to bring forward by the
questions put to him by for that purpose by the other: to those questions
neither dares ventures to refuse an answer, each seeing foreseeing that by
common superior upon whose will the allowance or disallowance of the
claim depends, that by this common superior, consciousness of wrong
would be the inference drawn from silence. The disputed article of subject of the dispute is
allotted adjudged by the father to the complaining child, plaintiff, or to the defendant, or to the child complained
against, as he sees fit. In this representation Here we have the model germ sediment and
the exemplification of judicature, and of judicial procedure in causes of a non-penal nature.

Why I found some berries on yonder bush: I was eating
gathering them and eating them when my Brother came up, and
in a line of anger called to commanded me to be gone bid me case gathering. I would have shared
them with him but that would not satisfy him: he said he had
discovered the tree them he said before I had and they were his. finding Finding his
anger ineffectual
me unmoved, he fell upon me, struck me, and reduced me to the
condition in which you see. me. Make him suffer, as he has made
me suffer, or the he will be continually the continue thus repeating the ill usage, and
I shall never be at peace. The father calls them together before him
as before, hears what each has to say for himself, what each thinks is forced to
say by the questions put to him by the other: and punishes or forbears to
punish as he sees fit. Here we have the germ of penal judicature, of judicial
procedure in causes of a penal nature, and in that form of penal
procedure, which among the German lawyers is distinguished by the name of
accusatorial.


Identifier: | JB/058/242/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-03-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

3-4

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

242

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

18911

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in