JB/015/027/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/015/027/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/015/027/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/015/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->12 June 1816<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Polit. Deontology</head></p>
 
<p>Wisdom of our ancestors – What is the acknowledgement<lb/>
 
made by him who makes use of this phrase?<lb/>
 
What but that be and thus who thinks or rather <add>whose opinion or rather</add> talk<lb/>
with him <add>whose discourse <del><gap/></del> agrees with his</add> are so many fools, incapable of forming<lb/>
a judgment for themselves.</p>
<p>Of this <add>an</add> acknowledgement to this effect what is<lb/>
the practical result? that they should <add>each of them</add> hold their <del>be</del><lb/>
tongue or <del>their</del> his pen whichsoever be the instrument<lb/>
of which he is making so <unclear>miserable</unclear> a use.</p>
<p>These wise ancestors of ours who are they?<lb/>
Men who in the first place had not <add>never had</add> before them<lb/>
<del>that</del> in the shape in which we have it before us,<lb/>
the question that lies before us; in the next place<lb/>
men who for their guidance had <del>neither the exper</del><lb/>
neither had any stock of <hi rend="underline">experience</hi> equal to that<lb/>
which we are in possession <del>of</del> did as but <unclear>venture</unclear><lb/>
to make use of it – nor <del>had</del> possessed in any degree<lb/>
so ample as to possess it the stock of liberty necessary<lb/>
to <unclear>any</unclear> <del>now</del> putting that experience to use.</p>
<p>Yes.  If either experience be necessary to wisdom<lb/>
or liberty to the faculty of making use of it – wisdom<lb/>
of ancestors is a contradiction in terms <add>self contradictory locution</add>, any proposition<lb/>
asserting the existence of it a self-contradictory<lb/>
proposition as well might one say the<lb/>
brilliancy of darkness, the opulence of penury<lb/>
the liberty of thraldom.</p>
<p>(a)  The most obstinate are they who have no opinion of their own:  who<lb/>
are governed by authority and not by "reason", not being governed by real<lb/>
reason has no application to them and is therefore lost upon them.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:05, 3 August 2022

Click Here To Edit

12 June 1816
Polit. Deontology

Wisdom of our ancestors – What is the acknowledgement
made by him who makes use of this phrase?
What but that be and thus who thinks or rather whose opinion or rather talk
with him whose discourse agrees with his are so many fools, incapable of forming
a judgment for themselves.

Of this an acknowledgement to this effect what is
the practical result? that they should each of them hold their be
tongue or their his pen whichsoever be the instrument
of which he is making so miserable a use.

These wise ancestors of ours who are they?
Men who in the first place had not never had before them
that in the shape in which we have it before us,
the question that lies before us; in the next place
men who for their guidance had neither the exper
neither had any stock of experience equal to that
which we are in possession of did as but venture
to make use of it – nor had possessed in any degree
so ample as to possess it the stock of liberty necessary
to any now putting that experience to use.

Yes. If either experience be necessary to wisdom
or liberty to the faculty of making use of it – wisdom
of ancestors is a contradiction in terms self contradictory locution, any proposition
asserting the existence of it a self-contradictory
proposition as well might one say the
brilliancy of darkness, the opulence of penury
the liberty of thraldom.

(a) The most obstinate are they who have no opinion of their own: who
are governed by authority and not by "reason", not being governed by real
reason has no application to them and is therefore lost upon them.


Identifier: | JB/015/027/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

1816-06-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

027

Info in main headings field

polit. deontology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e7*

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1813

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1813

Notes public

ID Number

5243

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in