JB/042/309/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/309/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1826. July Aug. 22</p>
<note><!-- Note in red ink -->These pages I think<lb/>
laid aside<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">A.M.</hi></note>


<head>Constitutional Code.</head>
<note>Ch. XII Judicatory collectively<lb/>
<del>S. <gap/> Function command to</del> all<lb/>
&sect; <del>3</del>9<add>Judges</add> Elementary functions<lb/>
Imperative universatized only<lb/>
Conectiation Courts</note><lb/>
<p><gap/> Almost fit perhaps (these be <gap/>) to <hi rend="underline">stand</hi></p>
Arts Objection <add>Ratiocination</add> answered. The imperative is here<lb/>
stated as function common to all Judges <add>leading principles if to</add>. The Consolation <note>1<lb/>
Objection - imperative<lb/>
function stated on necessarily<lb/>
common to all Judges - why<lb/>
more necessary than in<lb/>
Danish conciliatory court</note><lb/>
<del>Court</del> Judicatory invented in Denmark <add>quietly applauded, in</add> has been adopted<lb/>
and employed in various other political states: in particular<lb/>
in France by Bonaparte's Codes. <del>This</del> Of its beneficial effects<lb/>
the following <gap/> Table affords a practical demonstration. Admitting<lb/>
what can not but be admitted that for a large portion of<lb/>
the field of law and procedure, the imperative function must <gap/><lb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 19:09, 15 August 2022

Click Here To Edit

1826. July Aug. 22

These pages I think
laid aside
A.M.

Constitutional Code. Ch. XII Judicatory collectively
S. Function command to all
§ 39Judges Elementary functions
Imperative universatized only
Conectiation Courts

Almost fit perhaps (these be ) to stand

Arts Objection Ratiocination answered. The imperative is here
stated as function common to all Judges leading principles if to. The Consolation 1
Objection - imperative
function stated on necessarily
common to all Judges - why
more necessary than in
Danish conciliatory court

Court Judicatory invented in Denmark quietly applauded, in has been adopted
and employed in various other political states: in particular
in France by Bonaparte's Codes. This Of its beneficial effects
the following Table affords a practical demonstration. Admitting
what can not but be admitted that for a large portion of
the field of law and procedure, the imperative function must



Identifier: | JB/042/309/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

309

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

ratiocinative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

arthur moore

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"these pages i think laid aside. am"

ID Number

13232

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in