JB/054/032/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/054/032/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/054/032/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/032/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/032/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1824. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 7<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure  Code</head><lb/>
 
<note>Ch.  Means of execution<lb/>
 
&sect;, 3 – <del>immediate and preparatory</del> <add>definitive and eventual</add></note></p>
 
<p><unclear>Wish</unclear> indeed from the <gap/> could be the observation of him who<lb/>
speaking of these distinctions should rank them with merely <add>biographical</add> verbal ones.<lb/>
<del>the distinction he is <gap/></del> In these distinctions are involved the difference <del>between</del><lb/>
prosperity and ruin;  between life and death.</p>
<p>In every case, belong special causes of exception,<lb/>
in every case if it be right for you to <del>execu</del> issue a decree for<lb/>
the <add>mans</add> imprisonment of the man it will be right for you to<lb/>
cause that decree to be executed.  But it is not true<lb/>
that in every case in which it will <add>turn out to</add> be right that you<lb/>
should decree a man to be <gap/> and cause such<lb/>
decree to be executed, it would also be right that you should<lb/>
at the commencement of the suit you should cause him<lb/>
to be so dealt with.</p>
<p><del><gap/></del> <add>Hence in relation to immediate means of execution</add> an altogether necessary distinction – that<lb/>
between immediate means of <del>determinate</del> <add>definitive</add> execution,<lb/>
and immediate means of eventual execution.  Only<lb/>
to time and contingency does this distinction apply<lb/>
<add>means of</add> imprisonment in the case above exemplified, <add>means of </add> imprisonment<lb/>
as a means of <hi rend="underline">definitive</hi> execution of the <del>decree</del> imprisonment<lb/>
ordering decree:  means of imprisonment as moreover at the<lb/>
commencement of the suit, means of eventual execution,<lb/>
employed at the commencement of the suit for giving<lb/>
certainty to the execution of a sentence of imprisonment<lb/>
should the time come for the pronouncing of such sentence.</p>
<p>But though the means employed as means of<lb/>
execution may be the same as those that now<lb/>
are expected to be and accordingly come to be employed as<lb/>
means of definitive executive it is not by any means necessary <add>neither necessary nor so much<lb/>
as right nor right</add> that they should be so in every case.  Of those means of<lb/>
content exemption which as such will frequently be missing there<lb/>
is not one by which <add>the application of</add> suffering in a shape more or less afflictive<lb/>
is not produced.  But so as the <unclear>gold</unclear> effect is produced, the less<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> afflictive the evil means by which it is produced the better:<lb/>
<add><unclear>whereas</unclear></add> if therefore a means less afflictive than the definitive means of<lb/>
execution suffers for <del><gap/></del> securing the employment of them,<lb/>
those <del><gap/></del> means of eventual execution <del>must</del> ought to be – not the same with the means of definitive<lb/>
execution but different ones.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:35, 26 August 2022

Click Here To Edit

1824. Decr. 7
Procedure Code
Ch. Means of execution
§, 3 – immediate and preparatory definitive and eventual

Wish indeed from the could be the observation of him who
speaking of these distinctions should rank them with merely biographical verbal ones.
the distinction he is In these distinctions are involved the difference between
prosperity and ruin; between life and death.

In every case, belong special causes of exception,
in every case if it be right for you to execu issue a decree for
the mans imprisonment of the man it will be right for you to
cause that decree to be executed. But it is not true
that in every case in which it will turn out to be right that you
should decree a man to be and cause such
decree to be executed, it would also be right that you should
at the commencement of the suit you should cause him
to be so dealt with.

Hence in relation to immediate means of execution an altogether necessary distinction – that
between immediate means of determinate definitive execution,
and immediate means of eventual execution. Only
to time and contingency does this distinction apply
means of imprisonment in the case above exemplified, means of imprisonment
as a means of definitive execution of the decree imprisonment
ordering decree: means of imprisonment as moreover at the
commencement of the suit, means of eventual execution,
employed at the commencement of the suit for giving
certainty to the execution of a sentence of imprisonment
should the time come for the pronouncing of such sentence.

But though the means employed as means of
execution may be the same as those that now
are expected to be and accordingly come to be employed as
means of definitive executive it is not by any means necessary neither necessary nor so much
as right nor right
that they should be so in every case. Of those means of
content exemption which as such will frequently be missing there
is not one by which the application of suffering in a shape more or less afflictive
is not produced. But so as the gold effect is produced, the less
afflictive the evil means by which it is produced the better:
whereas if therefore a means less afflictive than the definitive means of
execution suffers for securing the employment of them,
those means of eventual execution must ought to be – not the same with the means of definitive
execution but different ones.


Identifier: | JB/054/032/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1824-12-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

125

Box

054

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

032

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c29 / c5 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17551

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in