★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1825. Jany. April 18 1831 July 4. B M | |||
Constitutional Code. | |||
III | |||
Ch. Judiciary collectively | |||
§.4. Fields of service | |||
§.6. <gap/> <gap/> | |||
§.7. <gap/><gap/> | |||
of Local field <gap/> & Rationale | |||
§.7. Intercommunity of Service | |||
5 | |||
Rationale | |||
16 | |||
Judicatory field omni- | |||
comprehensive. Reasons <gap/> | |||
territory Reasons | |||
16 | |||
Such intercommunity why? | |||
Reasons. No one judicatory of | |||
which the judge in | |||
giving effect to a just | |||
demand may not find | |||
it necessary to give | |||
effect to it in the | |||
territory of any | |||
other judicatory. | |||
Ratiocination | |||
Art. 16. This intercommunity why instituted? | |||
Ratiocination | |||
Art. <gap/> 11. Question Why with respect to territory under the <gap/> | |||
and render the field of action Why establish this intercommunity of | |||
field of action of each Judicatory all-comprehensive <gap/> render | |||
the local field of action thus all-comprehensive? | |||
Answer. — Reason | |||
1. Because the in the whole territory of the State, there exists | |||
not any spot, in on which, for giving effect to a just | |||
<gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/><gap/> <gap/> person | |||
demand and giving in the respect execution and effect to the correspondent portion <note>of law, it may not be</note> | |||
necessary for the judicatory applied to, whatever it be, to | |||
exercise its authority within the territory of any and <gap/> | |||
every other judicatory: and this — whatsoever may be the the relation | |||
of the individual to the suit, whether pursuer, defendant, witness | |||
witness, or <gap/> the proxy or assistant of a pursuer or a defendant. | |||
2. | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1825. Jany. April 18 1831 July 4. B M Constitutional Code.
III Ch. Judiciary collectively §.4. Fields of service §.6. §.7. of Local field & Rationale §.7. Intercommunity of Service
5
Rationale
16 Judicatory field omni- comprehensive. Reasons territory Reasons
16 Such intercommunity why? Reasons. No one judicatory of which the judge in giving effect to a just demand may not find it necessary to give effect to it in the territory of any other judicatory.
Ratiocination Art. 16. This intercommunity why instituted?
Ratiocination Art. 11. Question Why with respect to territory under the and render the field of action Why establish this intercommunity of field of action of each Judicatory all-comprehensive render the local field of action thus all-comprehensive?
Answer. — Reason
1. Because the in the whole territory of the State, there exists not any spot, in on which, for giving effect to a just person demand and giving in the respect execution and effect to the correspondent portion of law, it may not be necessary for the judicatory applied to, whatever it be, to exercise its authority within the territory of any and every other judicatory: and this — whatsoever may be the the relation of the individual to the suit, whether pursuer, defendant, witness witness, or the proxy or assistant of a pursuer or a defendant.
2.
Identifier: | JB/042/283/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-04-18 |
16 |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
283 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
ratiocinative |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e6 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
1824 |
|||
13206 |
|||