JB/042/287/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/287/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1831 July 10
Constitutional Code ++


Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
&sect;.6. Fields of service
or
&sect;.7. Intercommunity of jurisdiction
10
But, for the <gap/> determining to what judicatory for the purpose of all
suits taken together, jurisdiction, over in the most ordinary case, over all persons
and things situate situate within the territory of that same judicatory appertains,
&#x2014; the practical need, use and <gap/> reason is this: &#x2014; When If if
operated upon by at the instance of sets of the parties more than one, the same person, or the
same thing, can not always be operated upon with the same advantage
to both sets. <gap/> <gap/> In the chamber of an evidence-holder
for example, the same person can not be examined in the Justice Chamber
of two different judicatories at the same time hour; nor even
in one and the same Justice Chamber in the same minute: one and
the same thing, moveable or immoveable, can not or one and the same
mass of money, can not be disposed of at the same moment of time, with equal advantage to the
<gap/> the set of suitors in one suit, and the to a different set of
suitors who are suitors in a different suit: hence, in these cases
of conflicting interests <gap/> will <gap/> come the need of enactment, or in
Articles of law, enactive or instructional, or both, &#x2014; for determining to the party who is in
which set of suitors [+] the advantage shall be given.
[+] (that is to say: those
parties respectively which,
in each such <gap/> suit, have
right on their side)
As to persons, if, in any Judicatory the person in question has
a fixt residence a fixt place of residence, not having any fixt residence such place
in the territory Judge-shire of any other Judicatory, &#x2014; to the power power of the Judge
of that same Judicatory will this same same power be subjected remain subject with
a state of subjection, on and for all ordinary occasions: and (for example) for the purpose
of a suit, on the occasion occasion of which, the Judge of that same territory Judge-shire
has been the originating Judge. But, for the purpose of some suit, which
is in pending in the territory Justice Chamber of some other Judicatory, it may be
necessary that this same person should be examined and desirable,
were it possible, that he should be examined at this same moment
of time: here then is an occasion on which, and a purpose for
which, it may be necessary to distinguish <gap/> the three different Judicatories, by
correspondently different denominations: the one being the original or
say originating, or say original judicatory, and as such having ordinary
jurisdiction
jurisdiction over the person
in question; the other, extraordinary
and casual jurisdiction: the one having jurisdiction
over him in ordinary
instituted home suits; the other, in
extraneously in the respect extraneously-instituted suits.




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:37, 9 September 2022

Click Here To Edit

1831 July 10 Constitutional Code ++

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively §.6. Fields of service or §.7. Intercommunity of jurisdiction

10

But, for the determining to what judicatory for the purpose of all suits taken together, jurisdiction, over in the most ordinary case, over all persons and things situate situate within the territory of that same judicatory appertains, — the practical need, use and reason is this: — When If if operated upon by at the instance of sets of the parties more than one, the same person, or the same thing, can not always be operated upon with the same advantage to both sets. In the chamber of an evidence-holder for example, the same person can not be examined in the Justice Chamber of two different judicatories at the same time hour; nor even in one and the same Justice Chamber in the same minute: one and the same thing, moveable or immoveable, can not or one and the same mass of money, can not be disposed of at the same moment of time, with equal advantage to the the set of suitors in one suit, and the to a different set of suitors who are suitors in a different suit: hence, in these cases of conflicting interests will come the need of enactment, or in Articles of law, enactive or instructional, or both, — for determining to the party who is in which set of suitors [+] the advantage shall be given.

[+] (that is to say: those parties respectively which, in each such suit, have right on their side)

As to persons, if, in any Judicatory the person in question has a fixt residence a fixt place of residence, not having any fixt residence such place in the territory Judge-shire of any other Judicatory, — to the power power of the Judge of that same Judicatory will this same same power be subjected remain subject with a state of subjection, on and for all ordinary occasions: and (for example) for the purpose of a suit, on the occasion occasion of which, the Judge of that same territory Judge-shire has been the originating Judge. But, for the purpose of some suit, which is in pending in the territory Justice Chamber of some other Judicatory, it may be necessary that this same person should be examined and desirable, were it possible, that he should be examined at this same moment of time: here then is an occasion on which, and a purpose for which, it may be necessary to distinguish the three different Judicatories, by correspondently different denominations: the one being the original or say originating, or say original judicatory, and as such having ordinary jurisdiction jurisdiction over the person in question; the other, extraordinary and casual jurisdiction: the one having jurisdiction over him in ordinary instituted home suits; the other, in extraneously in the respect extraneously-instituted suits.



Identifier: | JB/042/287/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1831-07-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

287

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13210

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in