JB/047/043/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/043/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/047/043/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/043/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/043/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->7 Apr. 1803<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>To ascertain, <del>whether the</del> in the instance <add>case</add> of evidence thus<lb/>
 
circumstanced, whether the rejection <add>collusion</add> or the admission of it be the<lb/>
 
preferable course, apply to it the leading <add>cardinal fundamental</add> question – Which<lb/>
of <del>the</del> two results is the most probable upon the whole – <del>the<lb/>
<gap/></del> that it shall be false and <add>at the same time</add> yet persuasive <add>successful</add>, or that it shall<lb/>
be true?</p>
<p>The answer I think will hardly be that the <add><del><gap/></del> instances in which the</add> admission<lb/>
<add>result</add> of it will be prejudicial to <add>adverse to the ends</add> justice oftener <del><gap/></del> <add>than</add> it will be<lb/>
will be more numerous than those in which it will be conducive.</p>
<p>Supposing it ti be pronounced <add>in a general view</add> admissible, the next question<lb/>
will be under what conditions and restrictions?</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:17, 23 September 2022

Click Here To Edit

7 Apr. 1803
Evidence

To ascertain, whether the in the instance case of evidence thus
circumstanced, whether the rejection collusion or the admission of it be the
preferable course, apply to it the leading cardinal fundamental question – Which
of the two results is the most probable upon the whole – the
that it shall be false and at the same time yet persuasive successful, or that it shall
be true?

The answer I think will hardly be that the instances in which the admission
result of it will be prejudicial to adverse to the ends justice oftener than it will be
will be more numerous than those in which it will be conducive.

Supposing it ti be pronounced in a general view admissible, the next question
will be under what conditions and restrictions?


Identifier: | JB/047/043/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1803-04-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-8

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

043

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

john herbert koe

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

14911

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in