JB/047/069/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 18:40, 4 November 2022

27 June 1806
Evidence

In the case of the unlearned Judge, the corruptive influence of the
fee-gathering principle has never been denied was never doubted dissented of. To his that case the specific
remedy, the competent substitution of salary to fees was has been applied; and
the success of the application is equally out of dispute.

From the unlearned Judge, In the case of the learned Judge is we see

18 March 1806
Evidence

a person who distinguished – by what? By this: that to the moment of his elevation
to that high dignity still higher dignity exalted stature, he was at the service of every man, for the that spoke to him
that in equal readiness to defend rights and wrong, to advance truth
or falshood, for a guinea. In this difference circumstance is there any thing
that to do away so completely the demand for need of the same remedy?
Is it in the bosom of this particular sort of man the certainty is so entire in such a bosom of all others that we ought can with reason
make sure of reliance can be placed on an effectual resistance against a temptation under which
an average man is supposed to sink of course? Is the profit to
be made by made business less? Is the danger attached
to over eagerness in making it more formidable. Is there a King's
Bench for punishing learned judges, as there is for punishing unlearned
ones? Does a decision become wrong become right transgression law, by issuing passing through

out of unlearned as it does by passing through learned lips? mouths?

Identifier: \| JB/047/069/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.
Date_1	1806-06-27	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	047	Main Headings	evidence
Folio number	069	Info in main headings field	evidence
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	iping 1804
Marginals		Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1804
Notes public		ID Number	14937
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/047/069/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p><!-- pencil -->27 June 1806<lb/>
-<p>In the case of the unlearned judge, the <unclear>corruptions </unclear><gap/> of the <lb/>fu-<gap/> has never been denied.<add>was never<gap/>of</add>. So how can the simple<lb/>remedy, the <add>competent</add><unclear>institution</unclear> of <gap/> has been applied; and<lb/> this much of the application is equally and of <gap/>.</p>
+<!-- pencil --><head>Evidence</head></p>
-Given the unlearned Judge, the case of the learned Judge is<lb/><gap/> by what? <gap/>: this to the of his <gap/><lb/>to <gap/>, he was at the service of <unclear>wary man</unclear>, <del>for the</del><lb/><gap/> to defend rights and wrong, to<gap/> truth <lb/>or falsehood, for a <gap/>. In this <gap/> is than any thing<lb/><gap/>so completely that <gap/> for the same remedy?<lb/> on the <unclear>harm</unclear> of this particular sort of man the <gap/><lb/>in such a <gap/> of <gap/> that we <del>ought</del> are with reason<lb/><gap/>on<lb/><gap/> a temptation under which<lb/> an average man is <gap/> to much of <gap/>? If then proper to<lb/> be made by much<gap/> To the danger attached<lb/> to over<gap/> on making it <gap/><!-- non formidable? man something? --> Is there a <gap/><lb/><gap/> for <gap/> learned judges, as there is for <gap/> unlearned<lb/>men?
+<p>In the case of the unlearned Judge, the corruptive influence of the <lb/>
-Does <del><gap/></del> wrong become right by having<lb/><gap/> of unlearned as it does by helping through learned<gap/>?
+fee-gathering principle has never been denied <add>was never doubted dissented of</add>.  To his <add>that</add> case the specific<lb/>
+remedy, the <add>competent</add> substitution of salary to fees <del>was</del> has been applied; and<lb/>
+the success of the application is equally out of dispute.</p>
+<p>From the unlearned Judge, <add>In</add> the case of the learned Judge is <add>we see<p><!-- pencil -->18 March 1806<lb/>
+<!-- pencil --><head>Evidence</head></p>
+a person who</add>
+distinguished – by what?  By this:  that to the moment of his elevation<lb/>
+to that high dignity <add>still higher dignity exalted stature</add>, he was at the service of every man, <del>for the</del> <add>that spoke to him</add><lb/>
+<del>that</del> in equal readiness to defend rights and wrong, to advance truth<lb/>
+or falshood, for a guinea.  In this difference <add>circumstance</add> is there any thing<lb/>
+<del>that</del> to do away so completely the demand for <add>need of</add> the same remedy?<lb/>
+Is it <add>in the bosom of this particular sort of man the certainty is so entire</add> in such a bosom of all others that we <del>ought</del> can with reason<lb/>
+make sure of <add>reliance can be placed on</add> an effectual resistance against a temptation under which<lb/>
+an average man is supposed to sink of course?  Is the profit to<lb/> be made by made business less?  Is the <del><gap/></del> danger attached<lb/>
+to over eagerness in making it more formidable.  Is there a King's<lb/>
+Bench for punishing learned judges, as there is for punishing unlearned<lb/>
+ones?  Does <del>a decision become</del> wrong become right <add>transgression law</add>, by issuing <add>passing through</add><lb/>
+out of unlearned as it does by passing through learned lips? <add>mouths?</add></p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/047/069/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 18:40, 4 November 2022

Navigation

Search