JB/042/371/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/371/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1825 Nov. 14
Constitutional Code
 
1o
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
&sect;.16. Partiality obviated
In functions
 
Reported?
 
As to the question are you or are you not in the
relative situation in question &#x2014; <gap/> it to the question the objection
of its being a question calling for a self-accusing answer
does not apply to it: for in the being in any such situation
there is no blame. In this way no objection applies but
that by which the <gap/> indecision is brought to view: and
this would of itself would be pronounced abundantly <gap/>
 
If <gap/> in the case of any one a Judge of the substitute
grade to find any such question <gap/> would be indecorous,
be put put to any suit high functionaries as this <gap/>
in Westminster Hall superordinates or to Court
pf King's Bench or any of those other superiors in Westminster
Hall and be <gap/> still <gap/> shockingly and revoltingly
indecorous.
 
If so what <gap/> it be if put to the superordinates
of these same subordinates, the Members of the House of Lords?
Insanity not indecorum would be cordially imputed to the author
of any suit proposition, not indecorum to the proposition
itself
 
It would not only be
indecorous: but it
would be useless: for
being by situation
impeccable, they are
of course by the
in virtue of that same
situation unpunishable
Not but that in a
certain way they are
punishable: to wit <gap/>
impertinence his accusation
preferred to the House of
Commons to the House of
Lords. But this <gap/>
to impeccability
is but nominal: for
c<gap/> the accuser
there is but one day, and
in the year: and that
is that of the Great Ealands
 
This by so simple an assumption all dissenters or remain
way become &#x2014; right, and may this is as it should be






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:36, 2 December 2022

Click Here To Edit

1825 Nov. 14 Constitutional Code

1o Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively §.16. Partiality obviated In functions

Reported?

As to the question are you or are you not in the relative situation in question — it to the question the objection of its being a question calling for a self-accusing answer does not apply to it: for in the being in any such situation there is no blame. In this way no objection applies but that by which the indecision is brought to view: and this would of itself would be pronounced abundantly

If in the case of any one a Judge of the substitute grade to find any such question would be indecorous, be put put to any suit high functionaries as this in Westminster Hall superordinates or to Court pf King's Bench or any of those other superiors in Westminster Hall and be still shockingly and revoltingly indecorous.

If so what it be if put to the superordinates of these same subordinates, the Members of the House of Lords? Insanity not indecorum would be cordially imputed to the author of any suit proposition, not indecorum to the proposition itself

It would not only be indecorous: but it would be useless: for being by situation impeccable, they are of course by the in virtue of that same situation unpunishable Not but that in a certain way they are punishable: to wit impertinence his accusation preferred to the House of Commons to the House of Lords. But this to impeccability is but nominal: for c the accuser there is but one day, and in the year: and that is that of the Great Ealands

This by so simple an assumption all dissenters or remain way become — right, and may this is as it should be




Identifier: | JB/042/371/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-11-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

371

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"superseded?" [note in jb's hand]]]

ID Number

13294

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in