JB/143/140/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/143/140/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/143/140/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/143/140/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>Book 1. Chap. 12<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
Of Remuneratory Procedure.</head>  (Pages 8)</p>
 
<p>Reward ought only to be<lb/>
 
bestowed upon proof of<lb/>
 
desert</p>
<p>The consequence of neglecting<lb/>
this rule not<lb/>
equally important<lb/>
with neglect<hi rend="superscript">g</hi> the similar<lb/>
rule respect<hi rend="superscript">g</hi> punishment</p>
<p>At Rome there is an<lb/>
Advocate for the Devil<lb/>
who pleads against<lb/>
canonization of Saints</p>
<p>Peter the Great produced<lb/>
certificates of Qualification<lb/>
as he rose in the Army</p>
<p>In England the Attorney<lb/>
General contests the<lb/>
chains to dormant<lb/>
Peerages, why may he<lb/>
not context the creation<lb/>
of new Peers</p>
<p>It would be well were the<lb/>
the reason for public<lb/>
rewards always assigned</p>
<p>This was once the<lb/>
custom in creating Peers<lb/>
in Sweden it ceased in<lb/>
1774<hi rend="superscript">(1)</hi><lb/>
Note<lb/>
(a)  See extract from Courier<lb/>
of the Lower Rhine</p>
<pb/>
<p>In England the right<lb/>
of granting pensions<lb/>
is now limited, the<lb/>
number granted has<lb/>
been smaller since the<lb/>
limitation.</p>
<p>In France the amount<lb/>
of pensions was 27,000,000<lb/>
<gap/> where in England<lb/>
only 2,700,000.  It exhibits<lb/>
the difference between<lb/>
a limited and an<lb/>
absolute monarchy</p>
<p>In 1783 a new order<lb/>
of knighthood was created<lb/>
for Ireland.  It levied<lb/>
a tax upon honour,<lb/>
had it levied a tax<lb/>
upon property it<lb/>
might not so patiently<lb/>
have been borne</p>
<p>The general idea of<lb/>
remunatory <add>procedure</add> might be<lb/>
taken from criminal<lb/>
procedure, the main<lb/>
difference arises from<lb/>
the wishes of the agent<lb/>
with respect <del>of</del> <add>to</add> the publicity<lb/>
of his action.<lb/>
In criminal procedure<lb/>
he wishes to avoid,<lb/>
In remunatory procedure<lb/>
to obtain publicity</p>
<p>In the first case he tries<lb/>
to delay in the second to<lb/>
expedite the process</p>
<pb/>
<p>In both cases there<lb/>
is a necessity for<lb/>
two parties</p>
<p>In criminal for a<lb/>
prosecutor in remunatory<lb/>
for a contestor</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:28, 2 December 2022

Click Here To Edit

Book 1. Chap. 12
Of Remuneratory Procedure.
(Pages 8)

Reward ought only to be
bestowed upon proof of
desert

The consequence of neglecting
this rule not
equally important
with neglectg the similar
rule respectg punishment

At Rome there is an
Advocate for the Devil
who pleads against
canonization of Saints

Peter the Great produced
certificates of Qualification
as he rose in the Army

In England the Attorney
General contests the
chains to dormant
Peerages, why may he
not context the creation
of new Peers

It would be well were the
the reason for public
rewards always assigned

This was once the
custom in creating Peers
in Sweden it ceased in
1774(1)
Note
(a) See extract from Courier
of the Lower Rhine


---page break---

In England the right
of granting pensions
is now limited, the
number granted has
been smaller since the
limitation.

In France the amount
of pensions was 27,000,000
where in England
only 2,700,000. It exhibits
the difference between
a limited and an
absolute monarchy

In 1783 a new order
of knighthood was created
for Ireland. It levied
a tax upon honour,
had it levied a tax
upon property it
might not so patiently
have been borne

The general idea of
remunatory procedure might be
taken from criminal
procedure, the main
difference arises from
the wishes of the agent
with respect of to the publicity
of his action.
In criminal procedure
he wishes to avoid,
In remunatory procedure
to obtain publicity

In the first case he tries
to delay in the second to
expedite the process


---page break---

In both cases there
is a necessity for
two parties

In criminal for a
prosecutor in remunatory
for a contestor


Identifier: | JB/143/140/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 143.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

143

Main Headings

rationale of reward

Folio number

140

Info in main headings field

book 1 chap. 12 of remuneratory procedure (pages 8)

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

richard smith

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48773

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in