JB/041/093/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/041/093/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/041/093/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/093/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/041/093/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1831 Aug. 8<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code.</head> (1)<lb/>
 
<note>Ch. XV  Judge Deputes Occasional<lb/>
 
&sect;. 4.  Referees deputable</note></p>
 
<p>Instructional<lb/>
<del>Shall the</del> Power of applying coercion to the securing of<lb/>
evidence. <del>be given to the</del> Power of applying coercion to the<lb/>
purpose of securing execution.</p>
<p><del>Shall these</del> To Deputes occasional <add><gap/> be</add> located by the<lb/>
Judge.  To Depute occasional located not <add>by him</add> but at the instance<lb/>
of the parties.</p>
<p>Should <del>these powers be power for the case</del> these<lb/>
powers be given <add>conferred</add> of course – should they be rendered capable<lb/>
of being given by the Judge, subject in both cases to appeal<lb/>
to the Judge against the exercise given to them</p>
<p>Or should they not be conferred, either by the enactment<lb/>
or by the Judge, <del><gap/></del> otherwise than upon express<lb/>
application made on each instance by the Judge Depute<lb/>
occasional or the Referees?</p>
<p>Numerous are the diversifications:  and antecedently<lb/>
to experience, to come to a decision as to the choice of them respectively<lb/>
seems no easy matter.</p>
<p>By giving power to the Depute occasional as to<lb/>
the Referees, at once, delay <del><gap/></del> is secured:  the delay that<lb/>
would be produced by application to the Judge:  and the <del><gap/></del> <add>correspondent</add><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <unclear>mode</unclear> of justice <add>is that</add> to which this arrangement is most<lb/>
favorable.  By rendering the application necessary, injustice<lb/>
by the undue exercise of the powers is more effectually<lb/>
obviated:  and the <del>direct ends of justice are the ends of</del> <add><del>are the</del> and correspondent to vexation<lb/>
is the end of</add> justice to which this <del><gap/></del> arrangement is most favorable.</p>
<p>If the powers in question – or at any the <del>power of</del><lb/>
evidence securing power were not given otherwise than in consequence<lb/>
of application made to the Judge, the public at large<lb/>
might feel itself the more secure against abuse in the shape<lb/>
of vexation:  made <add>by</add> warning given of the eventual application<lb/>
to the Judge, the effect of the <add><unclear>actual</unclear></add> possession of the coercive power in question<lb/>
by the Depute occasional might in general be practiced.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:19, 16 December 2022

'Click Here To Edit

1831 Aug. 8
Constitutional Code. (1)
Ch. XV Judge Deputes Occasional
§. 4. Referees deputable

Instructional
Shall the Power of applying coercion to the securing of
evidence. be given to the Power of applying coercion to the
purpose of securing execution.

Shall these To Deputes occasional be located by the
Judge. To Depute occasional located not by him but at the instance
of the parties.

Should these powers be power for the case these
powers be given conferred of course – should they be rendered capable
of being given by the Judge, subject in both cases to appeal
to the Judge against the exercise given to them

Or should they not be conferred, either by the enactment
or by the Judge, otherwise than upon express
application made on each instance by the Judge Depute
occasional or the Referees?

Numerous are the diversifications: and antecedently
to experience, to come to a decision as to the choice of them respectively
seems no easy matter.

By giving power to the Depute occasional as to
the Referees, at once, delay is secured: the delay that
would be produced by application to the Judge: and the correspondent
mode of justice is that to which this arrangement is most
favorable. By rendering the application necessary, injustice
by the undue exercise of the powers is more effectually
obviated: and the direct ends of justice are the ends of are the and correspondent to vexation
is the end of
justice to which this arrangement is most favorable.

If the powers in question – or at any the power of
evidence securing power were not given otherwise than in consequence
of application made to the Judge, the public at large
might feel itself the more secure against abuse in the shape
of vexation: made by warning given of the eventual application
to the Judge, the effect of the actual possession of the coercive power in question
by the Depute occasional might in general be practiced.


Identifier: | JB/041/093/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

1831-08-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

093

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Instructional

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

C1

Penner

Watermarks

STREET & Co 1830

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Antonio Alcala Galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in