JB/042/515/001

Click Here To Edit

1823. May 31

Constitut. Code

Copied Jany 1827
Ch. XII Judiciary Ch IX Ministers collectively
§. 1326 Term of Service.
Nor aving good bak

It moves poles to see <gap/

Where is the Copy?
A.

Ratiocinative

Art. Question. Why are not thence functionaries have or question
continues in office rving good behaviour

Reason - Answer

1. Because continuance in office during good behaviour
is continuance in office during ill behaviour

By Continuance in office during good behaviour is meant
continuance in office during life or so long as the functionaries
pleases, subject only to distraction by judgement of a judicatory
grounded in such evidence as is required by a
judicatory. But in any office whatsoever the functionary
may be rendered compleatly inapt in respect of every one
of the several branches of appropriate aptitude: and any
therefore without the possibility of being dislocated produce
evil to an extent altogether unlimited.

First as to moral inaptitude, not to speak of
moral inaptitude in other shapes moral inaptitude or the
shape of corruption of corruptedness and corruptingness may have place to
in any office to any extent without possibility of adequate
proof by juducialibly receivable evidence.

This has Of this position the most perfect demonstration
has been given dissolved. To the corruption it is known by circumstances
what in the occurrence in question is the wish of the corruption
say for example in the judiciary the acquiring or to retaining an
estate in litigation. A The corrupter qu ing office<add>Between thea</add> some of the corrupting <add>corruptor - s</add>man of wealth
to a and a sin of the corruptor - a Judge it is settled that
upon the Corruptees adjudging to the Corruptor the estate in
question the Corruptor shall give to the Corrupted Judge man of wealth Sin of the corrupting Corrupted
of wealth Judge a lucrative office, or his daughter to wife
with a large fortune: [+] Of neither of the sins is it atin the last degree probable
that they willthat he will for spontaneously come forward in a Judicatory and give evidence)
of the transaction of neither if so far then- is it probable that he will thus spontaneously incur the displeasure of their respecter [+] and, to the father, by whom
is made to his son a certain allowance
is made which on the
receipt of the proprovision in
question he with
it makes no difference
whatever whether its the
hand into luck it may
as paid to his and or his sins
all down upon himself the indignation of his fathers and the whole by disgrace. But this relative
name is but an out of an infinity of others by which with little less than certain
severally the same corrupt purpose may might be effected.

Identifier: | JB/042/515/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1823-05-31	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	515	Info in main headings field	constitut. code
Image	001	Titles	ratiocinative
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1822
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1822
Notes public	[[notes_public::"copied jany 1827" [note in bentham's hand] "where is the copy? am"]]	ID Number	13438
Box Contents