JB/147/327/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/147/327/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/327/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/147/327/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->3 April 1810<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Sinecures</head></p>
 
<p><add><del>By</del></add> By the good Howard, I am well aware, <del>the<lb/>
 
sale of those offices</del> <add>instances of</add> oppression and extortion <del>being</del> <add>practised</add><lb/>
 
in virtue of an office <del><gap/></del> thus <del>description</del> <add>disposed of</add> being<lb/>
brought to light,<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> &#9758; In a Note, give the story of Judge Gould</note> the sale of <del>them by the</del><lb/>
by the Judges <del>by whom</del ><add>at whose hands, <del>from whom</del> while</add> the profits of the mischief were<lb/>
protected <del>and</del> <add>by them,</add> the prevention of it was expected,<lb/>
was stated as the cause of the <del><gap/></del> abuse.</p>
<p>But <add>by</add> the <unclear>sloak</unclear> thus left by the good Howard<lb/>
<del>shall no time be suffered</del> the abuse, he <del>in vain</del> laboured<lb/>
<add>in vain</add> to which, shall no man be screened than it was<lb/>
his wish to screen it.</p>
<p>What the good Howard <hi rend="underline">did</hi> see <del>at</del> was the<lb/>
abuse:  what in his situation  man could not see<lb/>
was the depth of the abuse and the depth which, to<lb/>
root out the abuse, it would consequently be necessary<lb/>
to give to the remedy.</p>
<p>Howard was not a lawyer.  Howard had<lb/>
not been <add>an</add> Attorney General.  <del>Howard was rather</del> <add>Never had Howard <del>either</del> been either</add> First<lb/>
Lord of the Treasury <del>nor</del> <add>or</add> Chancellor of the Exchequer.<lb/>
If, having filled <del>any</del> all or any of these offices, Howard<lb/>
had <hi rend="underline">then</hi> come out with a proposal for preventing<lb/>
the abuses of the law by <del>prohibiting the</del> substituting<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">gift</hi> of law offices to the sale of them, the plans of<lb/>
Howard would <add>indeed</add> have <unclear>inserted</unclear> that neglect, with which,<lb/>
by those whose <add>it</add> sinister interest, coupled with adequate power,<lb/>
they found in opposition to them, they have so long been<lb/>
treated.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 18:21, 27 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

3 April 1810
Sinecures

By By the good Howard, I am well aware, the
sale of those offices
instances of oppression and extortion being practised
in virtue of an office thus description disposed of being
brought to light,(a) (a) ☞ In a Note, give the story of Judge Gould the sale of them by the
by the Judges by whomat whose hands, from whom while the profits of the mischief were
protected and by them, the prevention of it was expected,
was stated as the cause of the abuse.

But by the sloak thus left by the good Howard
shall no time be suffered the abuse, he in vain laboured
in vain to which, shall no man be screened than it was
his wish to screen it.

What the good Howard did see at was the
abuse: what in his situation man could not see
was the depth of the abuse and the depth which, to
root out the abuse, it would consequently be necessary
to give to the remedy.

Howard was not a lawyer. Howard had
not been an Attorney General. Howard was rather Never had Howard either been either First
Lord of the Treasury nor or Chancellor of the Exchequer.
If, having filled any all or any of these offices, Howard
had then come out with a proposal for preventing
the abuses of the law by prohibiting the substituting
the gift of law offices to the sale of them, the plans of
Howard would indeed have inserted that neglect, with which,
by those whose it sinister interest, coupled with adequate power,
they found in opposition to them, they have so long been
treated.


Identifier: | JB/147/327/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.

Date_1

1810-04-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

147

Main Headings

Sinecures

Folio number

327

Info in main headings field

Sinecures &c

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E9

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

49552

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in