JB/091/081/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/091/081/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/081/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/081/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->23 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1806</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>There go months after months.  After that comes a Posteà,<lb/>
 
of which if <del><gap/></del> constructed upon the scale of the prior <add>antecedent</add><lb/>
 
proceeding, it seems easier to imagine <add>conceive</add> the continuation<lb/>
 
thence the end.  Of this continuation one part, though but<lb/>
one part is that which is given to it by the 9<hi rend="superscript">th</hi><lb/>
Resolution, and which indeed it would have been inconsistent<lb/>
with justice to have refused: –  <del>competency to parties<lb/>
fewer</del> liberty to complain of the Verdict (and <add>the complaint</add> certainly not<lb/>
meant to be in vain) as <del>being</del> <add>having been "given</add>  contrary to evidence, or<lb/>
"by misdirection of the Judge, <del><gap/> in the <gap/></del> sitting as Ordinary,<lb/>
or on the Circuit, or presiding in the Chambers:<lb/>
those sources of misdirection <add>or unfounded complaint of misdirection</add> in Scotland, for one in England.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:43, 17 February 2023

Click Here To Edit

23 Decr 1806

There go months after months. After that comes a Posteà,
of which if constructed upon the scale of the prior antecedent
proceeding, it seems easier to imagine conceive the continuation
thence the end. Of this continuation one part, though but
one part is that which is given to it by the 9th
Resolution, and which indeed it would have been inconsistent
with justice to have refused: – competency to parties
fewer
liberty to complain of the Verdict (and the complaint certainly not
meant to be in vain) as being having been "given contrary to evidence, or
"by misdirection of the Judge, in the sitting as Ordinary,
or on the Circuit, or presiding in the Chambers:
those sources of misdirection or unfounded complaint of misdirection in Scotland, for one in England.


Identifier: | JB/091/081/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1806-12-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

24 or 3

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

081

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e13

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

29077

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in