★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/091/081/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/081/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/091/081/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->23 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1806</p> | |||
<p>There go months after months. After that comes a Posteà,<lb/> | |||
of which if <del><gap/></del> constructed upon the scale of the prior <add>antecedent</add><lb/> | |||
proceeding, it seems easier to imagine <add>conceive</add> the continuation<lb/> | |||
thence the end. Of this continuation one part, though but<lb/> | |||
one part is that which is given to it by the 9<hi rend="superscript">th</hi><lb/> | |||
Resolution, and which indeed it would have been inconsistent<lb/> | |||
with justice to have refused: – <del>competency to parties<lb/> | |||
fewer</del> liberty to complain of the Verdict (and <add>the complaint</add> certainly not<lb/> | |||
meant to be in vain) as <del>being</del> <add>having been "given</add> contrary to evidence, or<lb/> | |||
"by misdirection of the Judge, <del><gap/> in the <gap/></del> sitting as Ordinary,<lb/> | |||
or on the Circuit, or presiding in the Chambers:<lb/> | |||
those sources of misdirection <add>or unfounded complaint of misdirection</add> in Scotland, for one in England.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
23 Decr 1806
There go months after months. After that comes a Posteà,
of which if constructed upon the scale of the prior antecedent
proceeding, it seems easier to imagine conceive the continuation
thence the end. Of this continuation one part, though but
one part is that which is given to it by the 9th
Resolution, and which indeed it would have been inconsistent
with justice to have refused: – competency to parties
fewer liberty to complain of the Verdict (and the complaint certainly not
meant to be in vain) as being having been "given contrary to evidence, or
"by misdirection of the Judge, in the sitting as Ordinary,
or on the Circuit, or presiding in the Chambers:
those sources of misdirection or unfounded complaint of misdirection in Scotland, for one in England.
|
Identifier: | JB/091/081/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1806-12-23 |
24 or 3 |
||
|
091 |
scotch reform |
||
|
081 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e13 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
29077 |
|||
