JB/091/049/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/091/049/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/049/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/049/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->8 Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1806<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Scotch Reform  To the People</head></p>
 
<p>I will not for the purpose of any argument – or to gain<lb/>
 
favour for any particular measure or with any set of men<lb/>
 
countenance same <add>so much</add> by implication, much less advance any<lb/>
doctrine so wicked or so absurd, as that <del>novelty</del> <add>against</add> in a measure<lb/>
of legislation, novelty ought to be regarded as a peremptory<lb/>
objection:  as if in legislation experience were worth<lb/>
nothing:  as if in the most important concerns of life it were<lb/>
matter either of duty or of prudence for experience to take <add>receive</add> the<lb/>
line from inexperience, knowledge from ignorance, civilization from<lb/>
barbarism.</p>
<p>At the same time <add>and in the same spirit train of thought</add> what I am no less ready to advance<lb/>
than to admitt, is – that as in eery other line of practice, so in<lb/>
legislation, experience of any institution itself accompanied<lb/>
by experience if advantage flowing from it, and unaccompanied<lb/>
with experience if any equivalent disadvantage issuing from it is a<lb/>
very important recommendation:  <add>insomuch</add> and that of two remedies,<lb/>
alike <unclear>presenting</unclear> in other respects, the one tried the other untried<lb/>
the former <add>possesses</add> has an indispensable claim <add>title</add> to preference.</p>
<p>In these sentiments I can take upon me to state it as<lb/>
no mean presumption in favour of the arrangements I have<lb/>
ventured to propose in the character of remedies, that there is<lb/>
scarce a single one that does not come recommended by experience:<lb/>
scarce a single one to which the term <hi rend="underline">innovation</hi><lb/>
can with justice <add>truth</add> be applied.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:57, 24 February 2023

Click Here To Edit

8 Novr 1806
Scotch Reform To the People

I will not for the purpose of any argument – or to gain
favour for any particular measure or with any set of men
countenance same so much by implication, much less advance any
doctrine so wicked or so absurd, as that novelty against in a measure
of legislation, novelty ought to be regarded as a peremptory
objection: as if in legislation experience were worth
nothing: as if in the most important concerns of life it were
matter either of duty or of prudence for experience to take receive the
line from inexperience, knowledge from ignorance, civilization from
barbarism.

At the same time and in the same spirit train of thought what I am no less ready to advance
than to admitt, is – that as in eery other line of practice, so in
legislation, experience of any institution itself accompanied
by experience if advantage flowing from it, and unaccompanied
with experience if any equivalent disadvantage issuing from it is a
very important recommendation: insomuch and that of two remedies,
alike presenting in other respects, the one tried the other untried
the former possesses has an indispensable claim title to preference.

In these sentiments I can take upon me to state it as
no mean presumption in favour of the arrangements I have
ventured to propose in the character of remedies, that there is
scarce a single one that does not come recommended by experience:
scarce a single one to which the term innovation
can with justice truth be applied.


Identifier: | JB/091/049/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1806-11-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

049

Info in main headings field

scotch reform to the people

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

29045

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in