JB/091/153/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/091/153/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/153/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/153/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->8 May 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Not unfrequently prudence <unclear>fuled</unclear> the disclosure <add>bringing forward</add> of the whole<lb/>
 
of the <add>a</add> plan at once.  Not that there is anything in it<lb/>
 
that will not bear the light:  not that there is in its anything<lb/>
 
that a man is <del>in some</del> desirous of keeping out of<lb/>
the light even at this time.  But the minds of <add>state of the mind in which</add> those on whom<lb/>
the acceptance of the plan depends are to be considered:<lb/>
they must not be overloaded:  <del>too cure</del> the requisite care must<lb/>
be taken not to give them too much at once <add>more than they can digest</add>.</p>
<p>Whatsoever I am here about to point out as being in<lb/>
my humble conception fit to be done, it may for aught<lb/>
I know have been in Your Lordship's intention to endeavour<lb/>
at.</p>
<p>As to the Bill <add>In particular Bill actually brought in</add> what is <del>clear</del> seeing clear enough is<lb/>
that <add>in point of prudence</add> neither <del>these proposed</del> the arrangements here proposed<lb/>
nor any other <del>such</del> regulations respecting the details of the<lb/>
system of procedure, could with advantage to the design,<lb/>
have formed any part of the Bill first brought in <add>pursuance</add> in consequence<lb/>
of it.  <del>At</del> The Bill as it stands was already<lb/>
found too complex.  Of three <del><gap/></del> perfectly distinct and easily<lb/>
separable parts, <del>the first part</del> Decision – Jury – Chamber<lb/>
of Review, the first one <add>found</add> with many approvers whose approbation<lb/>
did not go beyond it <add>extend to either of the two others:</add>  the first and<lb/>
second together perhaps some others when approbation did <add>extended not</add><lb/>
not extend to the third.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:58, 3 March 2023

Click Here To Edit

8 May 1807

Not unfrequently prudence fuled the disclosure bringing forward of the whole
of the a plan at once. Not that there is anything in it
that will not bear the light: not that there is in its anything
that a man is in some desirous of keeping out of
the light even at this time. But the minds of state of the mind in which those on whom
the acceptance of the plan depends are to be considered:
they must not be overloaded: too cure the requisite care must
be taken not to give them too much at once more than they can digest.

Whatsoever I am here about to point out as being in
my humble conception fit to be done, it may for aught
I know have been in Your Lordship's intention to endeavour
at.

As to the Bill In particular Bill actually brought in what is clear seeing clear enough is
that in point of prudence neither these proposed the arrangements here proposed
nor any other such regulations respecting the details of the
system of procedure, could with advantage to the design,
have formed any part of the Bill first brought in pursuance in consequence
of it. At The Bill as it stands was already
found too complex. Of three perfectly distinct and easily
separable parts, the first part Decision – Jury – Chamber
of Review, the first one found with many approvers whose approbation
did not go beyond it extend to either of the two others: the first and
second together perhaps some others when approbation did extended not
not extend to the third.


Identifier: | JB/091/153/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1807-05-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

153

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

29149

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in