JB/091/228/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/091/228/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/228/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/091/228/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->Feb<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1808</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Oblige the judge of the immediate <add>the single-seated</add> judicatory to decide<lb/>
 
<del>abolish at the same time the distinction between</del> prohibit<lb/>
 
at the same time the judges of the appellate, the many seated<lb/>
 
judicatory from taking cognizance of causes in the first<lb/>
instance, everything is thus far placed upon a footing at<lb/>
<gap/> rational, principle and <del><gap/></del> <gap/> to <del>the</del> <add>judicial</add> practice<lb/>
<unclear>are</unclear> the judicature of England and of other nations.<lb/>
<del>Inde</del> Immediate judicatory, single-seated, as in the case of<lb/>
the judicatories next in rank, the Sheriff's Courts – appellate<lb/>
and in other respects superordinate judicatory, a many seated<lb/>
judicatory.</p>
<p>That to <hi rend="underline"><unclear>disputeless</unclear></hi> i.e. <add>and thereby</add> to the avoidance of the evils of<lb/>
superfluous delay, vexation and expence in the great mass <add>bulk</add><lb/>
of causes the superiority of single seated judicatories will<lb/>
it is supposed be out of dispute.</p>
<p><del>Causes of difficulty</del> Difficulty in the nature of the<lb/>
cause, coupled with the vice of indecision on the intellectual<lb/>
part of the character of the Judge present an exception:  <del>the</del><lb/>
for in a many seated judicatory the slowness of one Judge<lb/>
even though he be the presiding Judge, may find a remedy <add>be remedied to a<lb/>
considerable degree</add> in the superior quickness of his colleagues:  as in a team<lb/>
a lazy or weak horse is dragged by <del><gap/></del> <add>by the others</add>, and his <del><gap/></del> <add>rate of going</add> made<lb/>
to keep pace with theirs.  But <del><gap/></del> to this mischief there<lb/>
are other remedies.</p>
<p><del>In</del> The great bulk of causes </add> <add>suits</add> <del><add>say</add> nine out of ten, or nineteen<lb/>
perhaps out of twenty</del> is composed of those in which<lb/>
the fault lies on the defendant's side, and the cause of it his reluctance<lb/>
or inability, <add>ultimate or temporary</add> to comply with the demands of justice.  In these instances,<lb/>
there being no <del><gap/></del> point really in dispute, no demand is<lb/>
made upon the evidence, none but upon the power of the Judge.  And <add>In</add><lb/>
in this predicament stand<lb/>
nine out of ten, or perhaps<lb/>
nineteen out of twenty<lb/>
of the whole number of<lb/>
<del>causes</del> suits.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:58, 10 March 2023

Click Here To Edit

Feby 1808

Oblige the judge of the immediate the single-seated judicatory to decide
abolish at the same time the distinction between prohibit
at the same time the judges of the appellate, the many seated
judicatory from taking cognizance of causes in the first
instance, everything is thus far placed upon a footing at
rational, principle and to the judicial practice
are the judicature of England and of other nations.
Inde Immediate judicatory, single-seated, as in the case of
the judicatories next in rank, the Sheriff's Courts – appellate
and in other respects superordinate judicatory, a many seated
judicatory.

That to disputeless i.e. and thereby to the avoidance of the evils of
superfluous delay, vexation and expence in the great mass bulk
of causes the superiority of single seated judicatories will
it is supposed be out of dispute.

Causes of difficulty Difficulty in the nature of the
cause, coupled with the vice of indecision on the intellectual
part of the character of the Judge present an exception: the
for in a many seated judicatory the slowness of one Judge
even though he be the presiding Judge, may find a remedy be remedied to a
considerable degree
in the superior quickness of his colleagues: as in a team
a lazy or weak horse is dragged by by the others, and his rate of going made
to keep pace with theirs. But to this mischief there
are other remedies.

In The great bulk of causes </add> suits say nine out of ten, or nineteen
perhaps out of twenty
is composed of those in which
the fault lies on the defendant's side, and the cause of it his reluctance
or inability, ultimate or temporary to comply with the demands of justice. In these instances,
there being no point really in dispute, no demand is
made upon the evidence, none but upon the power of the Judge. And In
in this predicament stand
nine out of ten, or perhaps
nineteen out of twenty
of the whole number of
causes suits.


Identifier: | JB/091/228/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1808-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

228

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / d22 / e19

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

29224

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in