JB/047/393/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/047/393/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/393/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/393/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->18 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1812  Ch. 12 &sect;. 2<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Evidence Introd</head></p>
 
<p><head>&sect;. 2.  Facts principal, <del><gap/></del> evidentiary-probative, <del><gap/></del> disprobative-informative.</head></p>
 
<p>2.  As to <hi rend="underline">utility</hi> – the utility of <del>such</del> a review<lb/>
 
of this sort, if it have may, <del>will</del> and will show<lb/>
itself in one or other of two opposite shapes:  <del>upon<lb/>
alike causing</del> the matter of fact in question be<lb/>
real <add>true</add>, in causing it <add>the existence truth of it</add> to be believed, or contributing to<lb/>
cause it to be believed:  if it be not true, in preventing<lb/>
or contributing to prevent it from being believed.<lb/>
In the first <del><gap/></del> way – in the way of promoting evidence<lb/>
where due, no <add>very</add> material service seems capable<lb/>
of being rendered by it.  <del>But in the way of preventing</del> <add>It is in such service</add><lb/>
<del>evidence</del> as it may be found capable of rendering<lb/>
towards the prevention of evidence where undue<lb/>
that <del>its first claim</del> <add>whatever claim it may be found to have</add> to the merit of utility must<lb/>
rest.</p>
<p>Considered with a view to those opposite effects,<lb/>
facts, operating in the <del>way of</del> character of articles<lb/>
of circumstantial evidence, may be divided into<lb/>
two classes.  To those, the effect <add>or tendency</add> of which is to gain<lb/>
evidence for the principal fact in question, may be<lb/>
preserved the appellation of <add><hi rend="underline">positive</hi> or <hi rend="underline">probative</add> evidentiary facts</hi>; – <del>as</del><lb/>
<add>or say simply of <hi rend="underline">evidentiary</hi> facts, as</add> above.  As to <del>those</del> a fact of the <hi rend="underline">other</hi> class, it<lb/>
supposes the existence of some <add>other fact in the character of a</add> <hi rend="underline">probative</hi> evidentiary<lb/>
fact, and the <add>effect or</add> tendency of it is to <hi rend="underline">weaken</hi> <del><add>its conclusion</add> the force<lb/>
of the conclusion</del> the <add>probative</add> force on the <del>strength</del> <add>magnitude</add> of which<lb/>
the intensity of the <hi rend="underline">persuasion</hi> produced by it depends:<lb/>
<add><del>reference made to such probative force, call it therefore an informative fact.</del></add> call it therefore, with reference to such probative force,<lb/>
an <hi rend="underline">informative</hi> fact.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 11:15, 28 April 2023

Click Here To Edit

18 Jany 1812 Ch. 12 §. 2
Evidence Introd

§. 2. Facts principal, evidentiary-probative, disprobative-informative.

2. As to utility – the utility of such a review
of this sort, if it have may, will and will show
itself in one or other of two opposite shapes: upon
alike causing
the matter of fact in question be
real true, in causing it the existence truth of it to be believed, or contributing to
cause it to be believed: if it be not true, in preventing
or contributing to prevent it from being believed.
In the first way – in the way of promoting evidence
where due, no very material service seems capable
of being rendered by it. But in the way of preventing It is in such service
evidence as it may be found capable of rendering
towards the prevention of evidence where undue
that its first claim whatever claim it may be found to have to the merit of utility must
rest.

Considered with a view to those opposite effects,
facts, operating in the way of character of articles
of circumstantial evidence, may be divided into
two classes. To those, the effect or tendency of which is to gain
evidence for the principal fact in question, may be
preserved the appellation of positive or <hi rend="underline">probative evidentiary facts</hi>; – as
or say simply of evidentiary facts, as above. As to those a fact of the other class, it
supposes the existence of some other fact in the character of a probative evidentiary
fact, and the effect or tendency of it is to weaken its conclusion the force
of the conclusion
the probative force on the strength magnitude of which
the intensity of the persuasion produced by it depends:
reference made to such probative force, call it therefore an informative fact. call it therefore, with reference to such probative force,
an informative fact.


Identifier: | JB/047/393/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1812-01-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

1

Box

047

Main Headings

rationale of judicial evidence

Folio number

393

Info in main headings field

evidence introd ch. 12

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e1 / f4 / f165

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15261

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in