★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/321/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/118/321/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->7 June 1812<lb/> | <p><!-- pencil -->7 June 1812<lb/> | ||
<!-- pencil --><head>Panopt. Observat<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> on Holford's Report</head></p> | <!-- pencil --><head>Panopt. Observat<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> on Holford's Report</head></p> | ||
Line 21: | Line 16: | ||
instance of the individual in question be less probable than<lb/> | instance of the individual in question be less probable than<lb/> | ||
in the instance of any other individual <add>in any other place</add> that could be named.</p> | in the instance of any other individual <add>in any other place</add> that could be named.</p> | ||
<p>3. That supposing in any such <del><gap/></del> shape transgression<lb/> | |||
to have notwithstanding been committed by him, the discovery<lb/> | |||
of it is in the instance of this individual, and<lb/> | |||
in his plan more probable more sure than in the instance<lb/> | |||
of any other individual that could be named.</p> | |||
<p>4. That thereupon <del>supposing</del> in case of discovery,<lb/> | |||
conviction for the purpose of <del>an</del> remedy in any shape<lb/> | |||
which by by the proper authority shall be deemed the proper<lb/> | |||
one, and in particular for the purpose of removal <add><gap/></add> and<lb/> | |||
thereupon removal itself would be more easy and more<lb/> | |||
sure than in the <add>case</add> instance of any other individual <add><del>is</del></add> and<lb/> | |||
upon any other plan that could be named.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
7 June 1812
Panopt. Observats on Holford's Report
In relation to all this presumed malpractice transgression in all those
several shapes the following are the points that will here
be contended for.
1. That in several some of the instances what is thus in that which
the individual Officer person a question is convicted of by in the way of anticipation
there is no malpractice transgression at all – there is nothing
wrong in it.
2. That wheresoever there is malpractice the presumed the future conduct
imputed and presumed comes with propriety under the
head of malpractice transgression, it is on the part the commission of it would in the
instance of the individual in question be less probable than
in the instance of any other individual in any other place that could be named.
3. That supposing in any such shape transgression
to have notwithstanding been committed by him, the discovery
of it is in the instance of this individual, and
in his plan more probable more sure than in the instance
of any other individual that could be named.
4. That thereupon supposing in case of discovery,
conviction for the purpose of an remedy in any shape
which by by the proper authority shall be deemed the proper
one, and in particular for the purpose of removal and
thereupon removal itself would be more easy and more
sure than in the case instance of any other individual is and
upon any other plan that could be named.
Identifier: | JB/118/321/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1812-06-07 |
|||
118 |
panopticon |
||
321 |
panopt. observat. on holford's report |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
john dickinson & c<…> 1809 |
||
a. levy |
|||
1809 |
|||
39375 |
|||