JB/118/317/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/317/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/118/317/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/317/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/317/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->21 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1812<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Panopt.</head></p>
 
<p><del>6.  By the opponents it is <unclear>insisted</unclear> upon that no <add>In Holford's Report it seems <unclear>assumed</unclear> and <gap/></add>
 
</del></p>
 
<p>6.  <del>7.  Facility for inspection and</del> Unexampled motives<lb/><lb/>
as well as means for inspection being among the most<lb/>
striking advantages of Panopticon plan, the whole force of<lb/>
the opponents is employed in the endeavour to inculcate<lb/>
the persuasion that all that would be without effect:<lb/>
<del>for that</del> nobody would come to see what was to be seen<lb/>
<del>in</del> were anything about the matter.  The objection, if<lb/>
there were anything in it, <del>could</del> <add>would</add> at least be without force<lb/>
<del>during</del> so long as Paul <del>and</del> <add>and</add> Becher, <add><del>it</del></add> either of them, lived.<lb/>
from the intensity of the jealousy existed in their minds by<lb/>
the bare <del><gap/></del> <add><hi rend="underline">apprehension</hi> to</add> judge of the effect which in this way<lb/>
would be produced by the <hi rend="underline">realization</hi> of the  <del><gap/></del> <add>obnoxious</add><lb/>
measures.</p>
<p>7.  Partiality shown by Holford to Paul and<lb/>
Becher against J.B.  Communication was given to <hi rend="underline">them</hi><lb/>
of J.B.s plan, <del>and</del> with his arguments as contained<lb/>
in the Panopticon Book;  <del>and Letters to Lord <gap/></del><lb/>
and, <del><gap/> as they are</del> their objections <del><gap/></del> <add>are</add> not only<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> printed, but by Holford himself, digested into<lb/>
a <add>ready-prepared</add> string of cross-examination interrogatories were made<lb/>
the most of.  <del>He got some little advantage by them, that to J.B. <add>Did he not at least seem a little <gap/> of them?</add><lb/>
<add>Inquire of <gap/></add> it seemed as if he became ashamed of their <gap/> at least<lb/>
in a manner given them upon (Inquire of Abercromby)</del><lb/>
<add>To JB.</add> No communication was given <del>to <gap/></del> of Paul's or Becher's<lb/>
plans, as contained either in Paul's Book or <add>Paul and</add> Becher's evidence.<lb/>
Nor consequence, <del>may not</del> <add>in</add> relation to them, <add><del>could</del> were</add> any questions <del>be</del> put to J.B.<lb/>
by the answers to which their imperfections may have been exposed.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:34, 12 May 2023

Click Here To Edit

21 Jany 1812
Panopt.

6. By the opponents it is insisted upon that no In Holford's Report it seems assumed and

6. 7. Facility for inspection and Unexampled motives

as well as means for inspection being among the most
striking advantages of Panopticon plan, the whole force of
the opponents is employed in the endeavour to inculcate
the persuasion that all that would be without effect:
for that nobody would come to see what was to be seen
in were anything about the matter. The objection, if
there were anything in it, could would at least be without force
during so long as Paul and and Becher, it either of them, lived.
from the intensity of the jealousy existed in their minds by
the bare apprehension to judge of the effect which in this way
would be produced by the realization of the obnoxious
measures.

7. Partiality shown by Holford to Paul and
Becher against J.B. Communication was given to them
of J.B.s plan, and with his arguments as contained
in the Panopticon Book; and Letters to Lord
and, as they are their objections are not only
printed, but by Holford himself, digested into
a ready-prepared string of cross-examination interrogatories were made
the most of. He got some little advantage by them, that to J.B. Did he not at least seem a little of them?
Inquire of it seemed as if he became ashamed of their at least
in a manner given them upon (Inquire of Abercromby)

To JB. No communication was given to of Paul's or Becher's
plans, as contained either in Paul's Book or Paul and Becher's evidence.
Nor consequence, may not in relation to them, could were any questions be put to J.B.
by the answers to which their imperfections may have been exposed.


Identifier: | JB/118/317/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

1812-01-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

5, 7

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

317

Info in main headings field

panopt.

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39371

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in