JB/118/359/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/118/359/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/359/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/359/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil --><head>Note (b)</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>(b)  Such being the heads of loss really incurred, and of them<lb/>
 
either already proved or fully capable of being proved, if <del>any<lb/>
 
one</del> in the <del><gap/> <gap/></del> description of the aggregate loss for<lb/>
 
which compensation is to be made any one of them were<lb/>
omitted, <del>the <gap/></del> so far from being what the Bill directs<lb/>
it to be, viz. "<hi rend="underline">liberal</hi>" it could not be <del>so much as</del> <add>anything like</add> just.<lb/>
Of this then the loss <add>of the</add> by the sale of the land may<lb/>
easily be ascertained.</p>
<p><del>Of the</del> As to the two other <del>the</del> <unclear>claims</unclear> viz. loss of the<lb/>
profit of the <add>private</add> manufacturing concern and loss of the profit<lb/>
by the contract is is but too evident how far short the<lb/>
greatest compensation which the Treasury could possibly think<lb/>
itself warranted in giving could not but fall, of what in<lb/>
probability they might have amounted to, and that these<lb/>
losses should both of them <del>be r</del> have been rendered altogether<lb/>
incapable of being estimated and thence of being adequately<lb/>
compensated, is one of the great hardships in the case:  but<lb/>
<add>surely</add> on neither head can the impossibility of giving adequate compensation<lb/>
be a reason for not giving any <add>refusing to give any</add> compensation<lb/>
at all for having it altogether uncompensated.</p>
<p>If under the words already in the Bill viz "large sum<lb/>
of money expended .... in making preparations for the performance<lb/>
of the said Agreement, all those several items could and would<lb/>
be excluded <del>the <gap/></del> <add>no such</add> Amendment <add>as that</add> here proposed would <del>not</del> indeed<lb/>
<unclear>then</unclear> be necessary.  But <del>of this <gap/></del> that such would be the<lb/>
interpretation M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham sees no sufficient ground of<lb/>
assurance:  not so much as in relation to the <add>private</add> manufacturing<lb/>
concern sacrificed, much less in relation to the Contract.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:13, 12 May 2023

Click Here To Edit

Note (b)

(b) Such being the heads of loss really incurred, and of them
either already proved or fully capable of being proved, if any
one
in the description of the aggregate loss for
which compensation is to be made any one of them were
omitted, the so far from being what the Bill directs
it to be, viz. "liberal" it could not be so much as anything like just.
Of this then the loss of the by the sale of the land may
easily be ascertained.

Of the As to the two other the claims viz. loss of the
profit of the private manufacturing concern and loss of the profit
by the contract is is but too evident how far short the
greatest compensation which the Treasury could possibly think
itself warranted in giving could not but fall, of what in
probability they might have amounted to, and that these
losses should both of them be r have been rendered altogether
incapable of being estimated and thence of being adequately
compensated, is one of the great hardships in the case: but
surely on neither head can the impossibility of giving adequate compensation
be a reason for not giving any refusing to give any compensation
at all for having it altogether uncompensated.

If under the words already in the Bill viz "large sum
of money expended .... in making preparations for the performance
of the said Agreement, all those several items could and would
be excluded the no such Amendment as that here proposed would not indeed
then be necessary. But of this that such would be the
interpretation Mr Bentham sees no sufficient ground of
assurance: not so much as in relation to the private manufacturing
concern sacrificed, much less in relation to the Contract.


Identifier: | JB/118/359/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

359

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note (b)

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39413

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in