JB/034/281/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/281/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/281/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/281/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825. Dec<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> 1o<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Constitutional Code</head> <note>Procedure Code?<lb/>
 
<add>Ch. XII  Judiciary</add> Collectively<lb/>
 
&sect;. 29.  Account-taking and Claim-receiving Judicatories</note></p>
 
<p><head>&sect;. 29  <del>Judicatories for</del> <hi rend="underline">Accounts<add>-taking</add> and Claim <add>receiving</add> Judicatories</hi></head></p>
<p>Instructions to the Legislator</p>
<p>In &sect;. 1 Under the head of <hi rend="underline">Exception judicatories</hi> reference<lb/>
may be <unclear>seen</unclear> made to this Section for certain species<lb/>
of cases which will <add>may</add> naturally appear to create a<lb/>
demand for particular sort of judicatory, acting by<lb/>
a particular set of rules, <del>but which</del> <add>which demand however will</add> on examination<lb/>
<del>will</del> be found not to <del>do its</del> <add>have place. </add>  These are <del>those which follow</del> <add>the cases, of which in</add><lb/>
<del>cognizance has in practice been taken by</del> <add>common practice cognizance has been given to</add> two sorts of special judicatories<lb/>
<del><add>distinguished</add> under the name of Accountability and Claim Receiving<lb/>
<add>Judicatories</add></del> the name of <hi rend="underline">Account-taking</hi> and  <add>Audit Courts and Courts of claims:  Audit Courts that is to say Account-taking, Courts of Claims that is to say</add> <hi rend="underline">Claim-receiving</hi><lb/>
Judicatories.  <del>In relation to these what will be<lb/>
seen is that the <gap/> is compared with other cases<lb/>
these do in truth present a demand for variation,<lb/>
but that the variation consists – not in the composition<lb/>
of the judicatory, nor yet in the source of shape <add>nor in the mode of proceeding in any respect</add><lb/>
the evidence or in the shape in which it should<lb/>
be required or admitted to be presented, but merely<lb/>
in the situation of the <hi rend="underline">locator</hi>:  of the functionary by<lb/>
whom they occupied in this case or the business<lb/>
of judicature is located.</del>  In all other <del>of</del> cases the<lb/>
situation of the functionary by whom in case of demand<lb/>
for extra supply of judicial labour, the supply is furnished<lb/>
is the principal in the several lines, he locating<lb/>
so many additional <del>Jud</del> Deputes permanent as the <add>extent</add> business<lb/>
appears to require.  In the instance of the cases here in<lb/>
question locators of this will be seen <add>not</add> to be incompetent, <del>the</del> <add>and</add><lb/>
the <add>that</add> Justice Minister<lb/>
is the only one who<lb/>
is competent is the<lb/>
Justice Minister.  On<lb/>
this consideration it is that the Section next to the one headed by the words Locable how is to the place, to which the explanation, that<lb/>
seemed demanded by the cases customarily referred to peculiar judicatories thus denominated has been referred.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:01, 31 May 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825. Decr. 1o
Constitutional Code Procedure Code?
Ch. XII Judiciary Collectively
§. 29. Account-taking and Claim-receiving Judicatories

§. 29 Judicatories for Accounts-taking and Claim receiving Judicatories

Instructions to the Legislator

In §. 1 Under the head of Exception judicatories reference
may be seen made to this Section for certain species
of cases which will may naturally appear to create a
demand for particular sort of judicatory, acting by
a particular set of rules, but which which demand however will on examination
will be found not to do its have place. These are those which follow the cases, of which in
cognizance has in practice been taken by common practice cognizance has been given to two sorts of special judicatories
distinguished under the name of Accountability and Claim Receiving
Judicatories
the name of Account-taking and Audit Courts and Courts of claims: Audit Courts that is to say Account-taking, Courts of Claims that is to say Claim-receiving
Judicatories. In relation to these what will be
seen is that the is compared with other cases
these do in truth present a demand for variation,
but that the variation consists – not in the composition
of the judicatory, nor yet in the source of shape nor in the mode of proceeding in any respect
the evidence or in the shape in which it should
be required or admitted to be presented, but merely
in the situation of the locator: of the functionary by
whom they occupied in this case or the business
of judicature is located.
In all other of cases the
situation of the functionary by whom in case of demand
for extra supply of judicial labour, the supply is furnished
is the principal in the several lines, he locating
so many additional Jud Deputes permanent as the extent business
appears to require. In the instance of the cases here in
question locators of this will be seen not to be incompetent, the and
the that Justice Minister
is the only one who
is competent is the
Justice Minister. On
this consideration it is that the Section next to the one headed by the words Locable how is to the place, to which the explanation, that
seemed demanded by the cases customarily referred to peculiar judicatories thus denominated has been referred.


Identifier: | JB/034/281/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1825-12-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code; procedure code

Folio number

281

Info in main headings field

constitutional code procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

10555

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in