JB/115/149/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/115/149/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/115/149/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/115/149/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>1823. August 31</head><lb/>
<head><del>Constitutional Code</del><add><gap/></add></head>
The Judge in the <gap/><lb/>
<p>Of an <gap/> alone  would the idea be endowed.  <del>A hollow</del>
<lb/>e<lb/>


<del><gap/></del> For each individual a <gap/> <gap/> of which the  bind<gap/><lb/>
<head>1823. August 31</head>
even of <gap/> and that show of <gap/> <gap/>ness that the favourite<lb/>
<head><del>Constitutional Code</del> On Penitentiary For Place</head>
of Pyramus and Thisbe would agree in the sufficiency of it.</p>
<p>The expence of this remedy <gap/><add>though it</add> to render it inapplicable<lb/>
would not for <gap/> would <gap/> <gap/> for depending<add><gap/></add> the super<gap/><lb/>
advocated from insisting on it</p>


<p>A <del><gap/></del> will <gap/> instance at a Sp<gap/> <gap/><lb/>
2 4
<del>would have</del> might have been ind<gap/>d with equal efficiency, that<lb/>
the <gap/> might have called forth &amp; <gap/><hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. and the St<gap/><lb/>
<gap/> find no such inconvenience</p>


Supposing the objection of expence got<add><gap/><add><gap/></add></add> even and the solitary<lb/>
<p>The hedge or the <sic>cuckow</sic></p>
mansion un<gap/>ed, the severity<add>purity</add> <gap/> this in <gap/> from<lb/>
<gap/> afforded would after all<add>send <gap/> rendered inst<gap/></add> not be abroad.  After all<lb/>
that <gap/> down for the prevention of those remains about modesty<lb/>
<gap/> the matter of these demands which delivery <gap/> th
master of would still remain <gap/>. <del><gap/> what</del> By what<lb/>
injenuity without opening the door to the inter<gap/> evil could then<lb/>
demand be satisfied.  Suppose a place appointed: <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
of will dessication<add>objective</add> appeared a <gap/> must be.  Fan <gap/>us at the  house<lb/>
not an individual ones so many hundreds not an individual by<lb/>
when this place would not have to be useless.  <gap/> what <del>posess</del><add><gap/>able </add> place<lb/>


<note>Quere this case for <gap/></note>


<p>Of one preventive alone could the idea be endured. <del>A hollow<lb/>
<gap/></del> For each individual a hollow cube of which the  boundaries<lb/>
were of stone, and that stone of such thickness that the <unclear>parable</unclear><lb/>
of Pyramus and Thisbe would agree on the sufficiency of it.</p>


<p>The <sic>expence</sic> of this remedy <add>though it</add> sufficed to render it inapplicable<lb/>
would not for <unclear>nothing</unclear> could have sufficed for defending <add><gap/></add> <del>the sup</del><lb/>
its advocates from insisting on it</p>
<p>A <del><gap/></del> well known instrument a Spanish padlock<lb/>
<del>would have</del> might have been endured with equal efficiency. But<lb/>
the padlock might have called forth a smile: <del>and</del> the Stone<lb/>
cell had no such inconvenience</p>
<p>Supposing the objection of <sic>expence</sic> got over <add>overcome</add> <add>surmounted</add> and the solitary<lb/>
mansion un<gap/>ed, the severity <add>purity</add> which this inspection principle<lb/>
afforded would after all <add>would have rendered <unclear>instance</unclear></add> not be attained.  After all<lb/>
that could be done for the prevention of these scenes which modesty<lb/>
forbids the mention of, these demands which delicacy forbids the<lb/>
mention of would still remain irresistible. <del>Upon what</del> By what<lb/>
ingenuity without opening the door to the intolerable evil could these<lb/>
demands be satisfied.  Suppose a plan appointed: and spite<lb/>
of all difficulties <add>objections</add> <unclear>appointed</unclear> a plan must be.  Can a door at the <unclear>house</unclear><lb/>
not an individual among so many hundreds not an individual by<lb/>
when this plan would not have to be visited.  Upon what <del>possible</del> <add><unclear>impossible</unclear></add> plan<lb/>
could <add>all</add> these visits be settled, and not <del><gap/></del> <add>remain</add> exposed to the <unclear>inadmissible</unclear> <add>intolerable</add><lb/>
and <unclear>unattainable</unclear> inconvenience? The whole <add>of the day has</add> time has taken<lb/>
<gap/> could it shortened by the whole number of persons say<lb/>
600 and the quotient allotted to each: the quotient, within the <add>and not that within</add> <add>in the compass of</add> <add><unclear>whose</unclear> quotient <note>would have to be<lb/>
included</note></add><lb/>
compass of which would be to be included journey to, journey from<lb/>
together with <add>as well</add> the intermediate demurrage. But whatsoever might be <lb/>
the <del>space</del> portion of time thus allotted by regulation, <add>the <unclear>necessity</unclear> of a case such as this</add> necessity is not<lb/>
then obsequious.  <unclear>Matters</unclear> altogether destructive of the <unclear>persecuted</unclear> under<lb/>
might to any amount be real: a slight indisposition would suffice<lb/>
to render them so. Moreover to another and <gap/> greater<lb/>
moment they might be, and in sufficient <unclear>number</unclear>, <gap/>dly <add>must afford by</add> would be<lb/>
<add><unclear>feigned</unclear></add></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:48, 9 June 2023

Click Here To Edit

1823. August 31 Constitutional Code On Penitentiary For Place

2 4

The hedge or the cuckow

Quere this case for

Of one preventive alone could the idea be endured. A hollow
For each individual a hollow cube of which the boundaries
were of stone, and that stone of such thickness that the parable
of Pyramus and Thisbe would agree on the sufficiency of it.

The expence of this remedy though it sufficed to render it inapplicable
would not for nothing could have sufficed for defending the sup
its advocates from insisting on it

A well known instrument a Spanish padlock
would have might have been endured with equal efficiency. But
the padlock might have called forth a smile: and the Stone
cell had no such inconvenience

Supposing the objection of expence got over overcome surmounted and the solitary
mansion uned, the severity purity which this inspection principle
afforded would after all would have rendered instance not be attained. After all
that could be done for the prevention of these scenes which modesty
forbids the mention of, these demands which delicacy forbids the
mention of would still remain irresistible. Upon what By what
ingenuity without opening the door to the intolerable evil could these
demands be satisfied. Suppose a plan appointed: and spite
of all difficulties objections appointed a plan must be. Can a door at the house
not an individual among so many hundreds not an individual by
when this plan would not have to be visited. Upon what possible impossible plan
could all these visits be settled, and not remain exposed to the inadmissible intolerable
and unattainable inconvenience? The whole of the day has time has taken
could it shortened by the whole number of persons say
600 and the quotient allotted to each: the quotient, within the and not that within in the compass of whose quotient would have to be
included

compass of which would be to be included journey to, journey from
together with as well the intermediate demurrage. But whatsoever might be
the space portion of time thus allotted by regulation, the necessity of a case such as this necessity is not
then obsequious. Matters altogether destructive of the persecuted under
might to any amount be real: a slight indisposition would suffice
to render them so. Moreover to another and greater
moment they might be, and in sufficient number, dly must afford by would be
feigned



Identifier: | JB/115/149/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 115.

Date_1

1823-08-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

115

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

149

Info in main headings field

on penitentiary for place

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37524

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in